Paper · 2013 · Acta Horticulturae

HEAT TOLERANCE IN FIELD GROWN TOMATOES (LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM MILL.) UNDER SEMI-ARID CONDITIONS OF WEST AFRICA

Y.O. Kugblenu; E. Oppong Danso; K. Ofori; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

One major reason for extremely low production of tomato in Ghana is that the length of the growing season last only for a few months due to the high temperature influx during the remaining months. The temperatures recorded during these months are above the optimum for tomato flowering and fruiting and this consequently affects yield. To solve this problem a number management practices may be undertaken such has growing heat tolerant tomato varieties or providing shade to mitigate the devastating effect of high temperatures. Therefore the present study was conducted outside the normal growing season from June to October, which has a mean temperature of 23°C. Heat tolerant tomato cultivars were grown from April to July with a mean temperature of 25°C to evaluate their performance under these conditions and to assess the effect of shading on the production of one of the genotypes. Fruiting percentage was significantly lower in exotic hybrids compared to a local variety. Different genotypes showed no differences in the production of viable pollen. Shading decreased final shoot and root biomass by 67 and 47%, respectively, whiles fruit yield was not affected. Also among cultivars yields were similar.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Exotic hybrids had lower fruiting percentage than a local tomato variety.

Material
exotic hybridse0
Outcome
Fruiting percentagee0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
a local varietye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruiting percentage was significantly lower in exotic hybrids compared to a local variety.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–981 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATOES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–38 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato genotypes did not differ in viable pollen production.

Material
Different genotypese0
Outcome
production of viable pollene0
Direction
no differencese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Different genotypes showed no differences in the production of viable pollen.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1059 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATOES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading decreased final tomato shoot biomass by 67%.

Organ / stage
shoote0
Treatment
Shadinge0
Outcome
shoot and root biomasse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
67e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shading decreased final shoot and root biomass by 67 and 47%, respectively, whiles fruit yield was not affected.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1172 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATOES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading decreased final tomato root biomass by 47%.

Organ / stage
roote0
Treatment
Shadinge0
Outcome
shoot and root biomasse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
47%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shading decreased final shoot and root biomass by 67 and 47%, respectively, whiles fruit yield was not affected.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1172 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATOES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading did not affect tomato fruit yield.

Treatment
Shadinge0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shading decreased final shoot and root biomass by 67 and 47%, respectively, whiles fruit yield was not affected.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1172 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATOES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–38 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato cultivars had similar yields.

Material
cultivarse0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
similare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Also among cultivars yields were similar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1173–1214 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATOES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–38 · show in text ↑

shade · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

27 papers: 21 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

shade · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

44 papers: 26 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.