Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen accumulation differed between water saving and traditional flooding irrigation on stem, green leaves and grain.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativat0 - Organ / stage
- stem, green leaves, and graine2
- Treatment
- water saving irrigatione2
- Outcome
- nitrogen accumulatione2
- Direction
- differencee2
- Comparator
- traditional flooding irrigatione2
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Lowland Rice Field”
e2“the difference of nitrogen accumulation between water saving irrigation and traditional flooding irrigation presented on stem, green leaves, and grain”
Title
Effects of Water and Fertilizer on Nitrogen Use Effeciency and Balance in Lowland Rice Field
Pingcang Zhang Journal of Irrigation and Drainage 2009
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Observation About half of the total nitrogen in rice plants accumulated in the grain.
- Intervention effect No significant difference in nitrogen accumulation between water saving and flooding irrigation on yellow leaves and unfilled grain.
- Method / resource The minus method gave higher nitrogen use efficiency in rice than the isotope tracer technique.
- Intervention effect Nitrogen use efficiency was higher under alternate wetting and drying irrigation than under continuous flooding irrigation.
- Intervention effect Nitrogen use efficiency was higher at low than at high nitrogen level.
- Observation Isotope tracer balance attributes 37.4% to 51.7% of nitrogen in lowland rice to NH3 volatilisation.
- Observation Isotope tracer balance attributes 20.4% to 37.7% of nitrogen in lowland rice to soil residue.
- Observation Isotope tracer balance attributes 9.2% to 36.4% of nitrogen in lowland rice to crop utilisation.
- Observation Isotope tracer balance attributes 0.3% to 16.4% of nitrogen in lowland rice to leaching.