Paper · 2009 · Journal of Irrigation and Drainage

Effects of Water and Fertilizer on Nitrogen Use Effeciency and Balance in Lowland Rice Field

Pingcang Zhang

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The nitrogen use efficiency and balance of different fertilizer level and methods under traditional continuous flooding irrigation and alternative wetting and drying irrigation by using lysimeter and isotope tracer technique.The results showed that the nitrogen accumulation in grain was about a half of the total amount in rice plant,the difference of nitrogen accumulation between water saving irrigation and traditional flooding irrigation presented on stem,green leaves,and grain,no significant difference on yellow leaves and unfilled grain;the nitrogen use efficiency acquired by minusing method was higher than that by isotope tracer technique,however the nitrogen use efficiency under alternative wetting and drying irrigation was higher than that under continuous flooding irrigation by the two methods,and that of low nitrogen level was higher than high nitrogen level;according to the calculation of nitrogen balance by isotope tracer technique,the nitrogen allocation in the lowland rice system presented that NH3 ammonia volatilation was 37.4%~51.7% percent,the soil nitrogen residue is 20.4%~37.7% percent,crop utilization is 9.2%~36.4% percent,and leaching is 0.3%~16.4% percent.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

About half of the total nitrogen in rice plants accumulated in the grain.

Organ / stage
graine1
Outcome
nitrogen accumulation in graine1
Value
about a halfe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the nitrogen accumulation in grain was about a half of the total amount in rice plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 249–334 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen accumulation differed between water saving and traditional flooding irrigation on stem, green leaves and grain.

Organ / stage
stem, green leaves, and graine2
Treatment
water saving irrigatione2
Outcome
nitrogen accumulatione2
Direction
differencee2
Comparator
traditional flooding irrigatione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lowland Rice Field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–92 · show in text ↑
e2

“the difference of nitrogen accumulation between water saving irrigation and traditional flooding irrigation presented on stem, green leaves, and grain”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 335–483 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No significant difference in nitrogen accumulation between water saving and flooding irrigation on yellow leaves and unfilled grain.

Treatment
water saving irrigatione2
Outcome
yellow leaves and unfilled graine3
Direction
no significant differencee3
Comparator
traditional flooding irrigatione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lowland Rice Field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–92 · show in text ↑
e2

“the difference of nitrogen accumulation between water saving irrigation and traditional flooding irrigation presented on stem, green leaves, and grain”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 335–483 · show in text ↑
e3

“no significant difference on yellow leaves and unfilled grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–545 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The minus method gave higher nitrogen use efficiency in rice than the isotope tracer technique.

Outcome
nitrogen use efficiencye4
Direction
highere4
Comparator
isotope tracer techniquee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lowland Rice Field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–92 · show in text ↑
e4

“the nitrogen use efficiency acquired by minusing method was higher than that by isotope tracer technique”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–650 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen use efficiency was higher under alternate wetting and drying irrigation than under continuous flooding irrigation.

Treatment
alternative wetting and drying irrigatione5
Outcome
nitrogen use efficiencye5
Direction
highere5
Comparator
continuous flooding irrigatione5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lowland Rice Field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–92 · show in text ↑
e5

“the nitrogen use efficiency under alternative wetting and drying irrigation was higher than that under continuous flooding irrigation by the two methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–811 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen use efficiency was higher at low than at high nitrogen level.

Treatment
low nitrogen levele6
Outcome
nitrogen use efficiencye5
Direction
highere6
Comparator
high nitrogen levele6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lowland Rice Field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–92 · show in text ↑
e5

“the nitrogen use efficiency under alternative wetting and drying irrigation was higher than that under continuous flooding irrigation by the two methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–811 · show in text ↑
e6

“that of low nitrogen level was higher than high nitrogen level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–878 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isotope tracer balance attributes 37.4% to 51.7% of nitrogen in lowland rice to NH3 volatilisation.

Outcome
NH3 ammonia volatilatione7
Value
37.4%~51.7% percente7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“the nitrogen allocation in the lowland rice system presented that NH3 ammonia volatilation was 37.4%~51.7% percent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1070 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isotope tracer balance attributes 20.4% to 37.7% of nitrogen in lowland rice to soil residue.

Outcome
soil nitrogen residuee1
Value
20.4%~37.7% percente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the nitrogen allocation in the lowland rice system presented that NH3 ammonia volatilation was 37.4%~51.7% percent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1070 · show in text ↑
e1

“the soil nitrogen residue is 20.4%~37.7% percent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1119 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isotope tracer balance attributes 9.2% to 36.4% of nitrogen in lowland rice to crop utilisation.

Outcome
crop utilizatione1
Value
9.2%~36.4% percente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the nitrogen allocation in the lowland rice system presented that NH3 ammonia volatilation was 37.4%~51.7% percent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1070 · show in text ↑
e1

“crop utilization is 9.2%~36.4% percent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1158 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isotope tracer balance attributes 0.3% to 16.4% of nitrogen in lowland rice to leaching.

Outcome
leachinge1
Value
0.3%~16.4% percente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the nitrogen allocation in the lowland rice system presented that NH3 ammonia volatilation was 37.4%~51.7% percent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1070 · show in text ↑
e1

“leaching is 0.3%~16.4% percent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1193 · show in text ↑

processing · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

irrigation · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 32 positive, 4 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

262 papers: 217 positive, 45 negative or no effect

216 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

258 papers more in this group

See all 262 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.