Paper · 2024 · Environmental Technology & Innovation

Increasing soil clay content increases soil phosphorus availability and improves the growth, physiology, and phosphorus uptake of rice under alternative wetting and mild drying irrigation

Yousef Alhaj Hamoud; Hiba Shaghaleh; Ke Zhang; et al.

11
claims
28
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Rice is threatened by ineffective inputs of water and fertilizers. Therefore, we detected the effect of soil clay content on plant physiological traits and their relationships to phosphorus (P) utilization -efficiency of rice under different irrigation options. Thus, our experiment was conducted in a two-factor randomized complete block design. The first factor was irrigation method, including three choices: alternate wetting/critical drying (AWCD) (50% drying), alternate wetting/sharp drying (AWSD) (30% drying), and alternative wetting/minor drying (AWMD), (10% drying). The second factor was soil clay amount, with three levels at 65, 50, and 30%, corresponding to SHC, SMC, and SLC. The root’s growth and activity were lower in AWCD × SLC than in AWMD × SHC. While the former treatment decreased the P content in soil, the latter increased their availability. The glutamine synthetase (492.5 µmol g-1h-1) was lower in AWCD × SLC than in AWMD × SHC at 1006.1 µmol g-1h-1, leading to the increase of oxidative cell damage. The optimal P nutrition improved plant growth under AWMD × SHC. The AWCD × SLC led to the minimum agronomic efficiency of P (PAE, 13.67 g/g) and the apparent recovery efficiency of P (PARE, 1.55%). However, the maximum values of PAE (44.05 g/g) and PARE (21.45%) were detected in AWMD × SHC. This study suggests that increasing soil clay content encourages the growth, yield, and P uptake of rice under alternate wetting/minor drying irrigation. The study has excellent application potential, providing technical support for precision water and P fertilizer management of rice.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice root growth and activity were lower under AWCD × SLC than AWMD × SHC.

Treatment
AWCD × SLCe0
Outcome
root’s growth and activitye0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
AWMD × SHCe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The root’s growth and activity were lower in AWCD × SLC than in AWMD × SHC.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–767 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AWCD × SLC decreased soil P content.

Treatment
AWCD × SLCe1
Outcome
P content in soile0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“While the former treatment decreased the P content in soil, the latter increased their availability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–868 · show in text ↑
e1

“The root’s growth and activity were lower in AWCD × SLC than in AWMD × SHC.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–767 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AWMD × SHC increased soil P availability.

Treatment
AWMD × SHCe1
Outcome
availabilitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“While the former treatment decreased the P content in soil, the latter increased their availability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–868 · show in text ↑
e1

“The root’s growth and activity were lower in AWCD × SLC than in AWMD × SHC.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–767 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glutamine synthetase activity was lower under AWCD × SLC, 492.5 µmol g-1h-1 versus 1006.1 µmol g-1h-1 under AWMD × SHC.

Treatment
AWCD × SLCe0
Gene
glutamine synthetasee0
Outcome
glutamine synthetasee0
Direction
lowere0
Value
492.5 µmol g-1h-1e0
Qualifier
1006.1 µmol g-1h-1e0
Comparator
AWMD × SHCe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The glutamine synthetase (492.5 µmol g-1h-1) was lower in AWCD × SLC than in AWMD × SHC at 1006.1 µmol g-1h-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–978 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–134 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AWCD × SLC increased oxidative cell damage.

Treatment
AWCD × SLCe1
Outcome
oxidative cell damagee0
Direction
increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leading to the increase of oxidative cell damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1028 · show in text ↑
e1

“The glutamine synthetase (492.5 µmol g-1h-1) was lower in AWCD × SLC than in AWMD × SHC at 1006.1 µmol g-1h-1, leading to the increase of oxidative cell damage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–1029 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–134 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimal P nutrition improved plant growth under AWMD × SHC.

Treatment
AWMD × SHCe0
Compound
Pe0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
improvede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The optimal P nutrition improved plant growth under AWMD × SHC.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1093 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AWCD × SLC gave minimum P agronomic efficiency of 13.67 g/g.

Treatment
AWCD × SLCe0
Outcome
agronomic efficiency of Pe0
Direction
minimume0
Value
13.67 g/ge0
Comparator
AWMD × SHCe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The AWCD × SLC led to the minimum agronomic efficiency of P (PAE, 13.67 g/g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1170 · show in text ↑
e1

“However, the maximum values of PAE (44.05 g/g) and PARE (21.45%) were detected in AWMD × SHC.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1228–1321 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AWCD × SLC gave minimum P apparent recovery efficiency of 1.55%.

Treatment
AWCD × SLCe0
Outcome
apparent recovery efficiency of Pe0
Direction
minimume0
Value
1.55%e0
Comparator
AWMD × SHCe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The AWCD × SLC led to the minimum agronomic efficiency of P (PAE, 13.67 g/g) and the apparent recovery efficiency of P (PARE, 1.55%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1227 · show in text ↑
e1

“However, the maximum values of PAE (44.05 g/g) and PARE (21.45%) were detected in AWMD × SHC.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1228–1321 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AWMD × SHC gave maximum PAE of 44.05 g/g.

Treatment
AWMD × SHCe0
Outcome
PAEe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
44.05 g/ge0
Comparator
AWCD × SLCe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the maximum values of PAE (44.05 g/g) and PARE (21.45%) were detected in AWMD × SHC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1320 · show in text ↑
e1

“The AWCD × SLC led to the minimum agronomic efficiency of P (PAE, 13.67 g/g) and the apparent recovery efficiency of P (PARE, 1.55%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1227 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AWMD × SHC gave maximum PARE of 21.45%.

Treatment
AWMD × SHCe0
Outcome
PAREe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
21.45%e0
Comparator
AWCD × SLCe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the maximum values of PAE (44.05 g/g) and PARE (21.45%) were detected in AWMD × SHC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1320 · show in text ↑
e1

“The AWCD × SLC led to the minimum agronomic efficiency of P (PAE, 13.67 g/g) and the apparent recovery efficiency of P (PARE, 1.55%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1227 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–134 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest increasing soil clay content under alternate wetting and minor drying to encourage rice growth, yield and P uptake.

Treatment
increasing soil clay contente0
Outcome
growth, yield, and P uptakee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing soil clay content encourages the growth, yield, and P uptake of rice under alternate wetting/minor drying irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1347–1474 · show in text ↑

processing · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

processing · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 27 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

processing · molecular: metabolites · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

57 papers: 48 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 48 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

processing · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

88 papers: 56 positive, 32 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

84 papers more in this group

See all 88 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.