Paper · 2006 · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Iron (Fe) bioavailability and the distribution of anti‐Fe nutrition biochemicals in the unpolished, polished grain and bran fraction of five rice genotypes

Chanakan Prom‐u‐thai; Longbin Huang; Raymond P Glahn; et al.

15
claims
28
verbatim quotes
32
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Iron (Fe) bioavailability in unpolished, polished grain and bran fraction of five rice genotypes with a range of Fe contents was measured by in vitro digestion and cultured Caco‐2 cells of cooked grain. There was a significant difference in Fe bioavailability among the five rice genotypes tested, in both the unpolished and polished grain. The range of Fe bioavailability variation in polished rice was much wider than that of unpolished, suggesting the importance of using Fe levels and bioavailability in polished rice grain as the basis for selecting high‐Fe rice cultivars for both agronomic and breeding purposes. Milling and polishing the grain to produce polished (or white) rice increased Fe bioavailability in all genotypes. Iron bioavailability in polished rice was high in the UBON2 and Nishiki, intermediate in both IR68144 and KDML105, and low in CMU122. All genotypes had low bioavailability of Fe in bran fraction compared to unpolished and polished grain, except in CMU122. CMU122 contained the lowest level of bioavailable Fe in unpolished and polished grain and bran, because of the dark purple pericarp colored grain and associated tannin content. The level of bioavailable Fe was not significantly correlated with grain Fe concentration or grain phytate levels among these five genotypes tested. The negative relationship between Fe bioavailability and the levels of total extractable phenol was only observed in unpolished ( r = −0.83**) and bran fraction ( r = −0.50*). The present results suggested that total extractable phenol and tannin contents could also contribute to lowering bioavailability of Fe in rice grain, in addition to phytate. Copyright © 2006 Society of Chemical Industry

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Iron bioavailability differed significantly among five rice genotypes in unpolished and polished grain.

Material
five rice genotypese0
Organ / stage
unpolished and polished graine0
Outcome
Fe bioavailabilitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant difference in Fe bioavailability among the five rice genotypes tested, in both the unpolished and polished grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–348 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 141–145 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Polished rice had a wider range of Fe bioavailability than unpolished rice.

Organ / stage
polished ricee0
Outcome
Fe bioavailability variatione0
Direction
much widere0
Comparator
unpolishede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“range of Fe bioavailability variation in polished rice was much wider than that of unpolished”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–447 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Milling and polishing increased Fe bioavailability in every genotype.

Treatment
Milling and polishinge0
Outcome
Fe bioavailabilitye0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
graine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Milling and polishing the grain to produce polished (or white) rice increased Fe bioavailability in all genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–742 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UBON2 had high polished grain Fe bioavailability.

Material
UBON2e0
Organ / stage
polished ricee0
Outcome
Iron bioavailabilitye0
Qualifier
highe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Iron bioavailability in polished rice was high in the UBON2 and Nishiki”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–815 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nishiki had high polished grain Fe bioavailability.

Material
Nishikie0
Organ / stage
polished ricee0
Outcome
Iron bioavailabilitye0
Qualifier
highe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Iron bioavailability in polished rice was high in the UBON2 and Nishiki”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–815 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IR68144 had intermediate polished grain Fe bioavailability.

Material
IR68144e0
Outcome
Iron bioavailabilitye1
Qualifier
intermediatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“intermediate in both IR68144 and KDML105”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–857 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 141–145 · show in text ↑
e1

“Iron bioavailability in polished rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–781 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KDML105 had intermediate polished grain Fe bioavailability.

Material
KDML105e0
Outcome
Iron bioavailabilitye1
Qualifier
intermediatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“intermediate in both IR68144 and KDML105”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–857 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 141–145 · show in text ↑
e1

“Iron bioavailability in polished rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–781 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CMU122 had low polished grain Fe bioavailability.

Material
CMU122e0
Outcome
Iron bioavailabilitye1
Qualifier
lowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“low in CMU122”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–876 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 141–145 · show in text ↑
e1

“Iron bioavailability in polished rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–781 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bran Fe bioavailability was low relative to grain in all genotypes except CMU122.

Organ / stage
bran fractione0
Outcome
bioavailability of Fee0
Direction
lowe0
Qualifier
except in CMU122e0
Comparator
unpolished and polished graine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All genotypes had low bioavailability of Fe in bran fraction compared to unpolished and polished grain, except in CMU122”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–998 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 141–145 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CMU122 had the lowest bioavailable Fe in every grain fraction, attributed to purple pericarp and tannins.

Material
CMU122e0
Compound
tannine0
Outcome
bioavailable Fee0
Qualifier
because of the dark purple pericarp colored grain and associated tannin contente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CMU122 contained the lowest level of bioavailable Fe in unpolished and polished grain and bran, because of the dark purple pericarp colored grain and associated tannin content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1175 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 141–145 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bioavailable Fe was not significantly correlated with grain Fe concentration.

Compound
grain Fe concentratione0
Outcome
bioavailable Fee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bioavailable Fe was not significantly correlated with grain Fe concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1266 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 141–145 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bioavailable Fe was not significantly correlated with grain phytate.

Compound
grain phytate levelse0
Outcome
bioavailable Fee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bioavailable Fe was not significantly correlated with grain Fe concentration or grain phytate levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1290 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 141–145 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fe bioavailability was negatively associated with phenol in unpolished rice.

Organ / stage
unpolishede0
Compound
total extractable phenole0
Outcome
Fe bioavailabilitye0
Direction
negativee0
Value
−0.83**e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“negative relationship between Fe bioavailability and the levels of total extractable phenol was only observed in unpolished ( r = −0.83**)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1468 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 141–145 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fe bioavailability was negatively associated with phenol in bran.

Organ / stage
bran fractione0
Compound
total extractable phenole0
Outcome
Fe bioavailabilitye0
Direction
negativee0
Value
−0.50*e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“negative relationship between Fe bioavailability and the levels of total extractable phenol was only observed in unpolished ( r = −0.83**) and bran fraction ( r = −0.50*)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1500 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 141–145 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest phenol and tannins also reduce Fe bioavailability in rice grain.

Compound
total extractable phenol and tannine0
Outcome
bioavailability of Fee0
Qualifier
could also contributee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total extractable phenol and tannin contents could also contribute to lowering bioavailability of Fe in rice grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1537–1651 · show in text ↑

processing · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 27 positive, 8 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.