Intervention effectmodel-written summary

weeding film increased yield against common film or no film.

A claim from Preliminary Report on the Result of the Technology for Polythene Mulched Peanut · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

weeding film increased yield against common film or no film.

Treatment
weedinge0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
common film or without filme0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the crop under weeding or light-degrading films gave more yields, compared with the crop under common film or without film”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–471
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–79

Title

Preliminary Report on the Result of the Technology for Polythene Mulched Peanut

Lin Wu 2001

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-11bc88eb33300edc6b81d8db00f76dbd537dd63a5c91eda8b8e7dae7e071ab56 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

herbicide · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

230 papers: 172 positive, 58 negative or no effect

171 papers in the same direction as this claim · 51 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    The highest herbicide rates reduced yield for most crops.

    Cotton, Peanut, and Soybean Response to Sublethal Rates of Dicamba, Glufosinate, and 2,4-D · 2012

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Peanuts kept weed free for 6 weeks after emergence had seed yield reduced by no more than 3% compared with season-long weed-free peanuts.

    Bristly Starbur (Acanthospermum hispidum) Interference in Peanuts (Arachis hypogaea) · 1989 · compared with maintained weed free for the entire season

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    No differences in peanut yield were observed between PPI or PRE applications of either ethalfluralin or pendimethalin.

    Annual Grass Control with Preplant Incorporated and Preemergence Applications of Ethalfluralin and Pendimethalin in PeanutArachis hypogaea1 · 2001 · compared with PPI

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Postemergence herbicides generally did not improve peanut yield.

    Flumioxazin Systems for Weed Management in North Carolina Peanut (Arachis hypogaea)1 · 2002

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    The winter fallow high herbicide input system yielded 7 to 26% less peanut than the highest yielding system with a winter cover crop.

    Weed Control In Peanut Grown in a High-Residue Conservation-Tillage System · 2007 · compared with highest yielding system that included a winter cover crop

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    At-planting herbicide alone gave lower peanut yields.

    Management of Broadleaf Signalgrass (Brachiaria platyphylla) in Peanuts (Arachis hypogaea) with Herbicides · 1982

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Timing of herbicide application did not affect peanut yield.

    Purple Nutsedge Control in Peanut as Affected by Imazameth and Imazethapyr Application Timing1 · 1997

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Herbicides, nematicide, and inoculant had no significant effect on peanut yield, sound mature kernels, or ether extract.

    Effects of Herbicides, a Nematicide and Rhizobium Inoculant on Yield, Chemical Composition and Nodulation of Starr Peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.)1 · 1976

    Opposite direction

221 papers more in this group

See all 230 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.