Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Plastic film produced more branches.

A claim from Preliminary Report on the Result of the Technology for Polythene Mulched Peanut · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic film produced more branches.

Treatment
plastic film (special film)e0
Outcome
branchese0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
without filme0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the peanut grew under plastic film (special film) presented more branches, heavier fresh vine, more plump fruits and bigger pod than that without film”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 40–190
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–79

Title

Preliminary Report on the Result of the Technology for Polythene Mulched Peanut

Lin Wu 2001

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-9e798a838dc148c85b05d5742aac7ca155c56ae9ee4cf472be66627164ef60e9 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

mulching · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 22 positive, 4 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    mulches used had no statistically significant effect on leaf and branch counts.

    Study on the efficacy of some bio resources as mulch for soil moisture conservation and yield of rain fed groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) · 2005

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    The tested mulch and amendments did not improve groundnut growth.

    Effect of mulching and amelioration on growth and yield of groundnut on saline soil · 2017

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Black-white and black mulch films had no adverse effect on peanut emergence rate compared with ordinary mulch film.

    Effects of Different Film Mulching on the Economic Character and Yield of Peanut and Benefit Analysis · 2010 · compared with ordinary mulch film

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Prior film mulching reduced peanut biomass by 4.7%.

    Prior film mulching alters cadmium dynamics at the soil–plant interface in successive crops: enhancing phytoremediation and ensuring safe production · 2026 · compared with non-film mulched (NFM) treatments

    Opposite direction

  5. positive
    Groundnut germination occurred 10 12 days earlier with polythene mulch.

    Performance of winter groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) with polythene mulch under rainfed condition of Manipur valley · 2001

    Same direction

  6. positive
    Polythene mulch maximized germination percentage versus no mulch.

    Productivity Enhancement of Rabi Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) under Polythene Mulching and Rhizobium Inoculation under New Alluvial Zone of West Bengal · 2018 · compared with without mulch

    Same direction

  7. positive
    Plastic mulching significantly increased NR activities and root vigor from seedling to pod setting.

    Effects of Continuous Cropping on Agronomic Traits and Physiological Characteristics of Peanut and Its Regulation under Plastic Mulching · 2012

    Same direction

  8. positive
    Under mulch, peanut germination rate, growing time and plant height were much higher than in the no-mulch control.

    Effect of Mulching on Growth and Yield of Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) on the Coastal Sandy Land in Nghe An Province, Vietnam · 2022 · compared with no-mulch control

    Same direction

17 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.