Claim · model-written summary
Film increased peanut yield versus unmulched peanut.
- Taxon
- Peanut
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- plastic film (special film)e1
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- more significante0
- Comparator
- unmulched peanute0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the yield was more significant than unmulched peanut”
e1“the peanut grew under plastic film (special film) presented more branches, heavier fresh vine, more plump fruits and bigger pod than that without film”
t0“Peanut”
Title
Preliminary Report on the Result of the Technology for Polythene Mulched Peanut
Lin Wu 2001
Other claims from this paper (11)
- Intervention effect Plastic film produced more branches.
- Intervention effect Plastic film produced heavier fresh vine.
- Intervention effect Plastic film produced more plump fruits.
- Intervention effect Plastic film produced bigger pod.
- Intervention effect Weeding film and light-degrading film had no obvious yield difference.
- Intervention effect weeding film increased yield against common film or no film.
- Intervention effect light-degrading film increased yield against common film or no film.
- Intervention effect Early film cultivation produced higher stem.
- Intervention effect Early film cultivation produced longer lateral branches.
- Intervention effect Early film cultivation produced advantage number of total branches.
- Intervention effect Early film cultivation produced higher pod yield.