Intervention effectmodel-written summary

GMMF increased average pod yield by 27.85 relative to RTNM.

A claim from Effects of Soil Tillage, Management Practices, and Mulching Film Application on Soil Health and Peanut Yield in a Continuous Cropping System · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GMMF increased average pod yield by 27.85 relative to RTNM.

Treatment
GMMFe0
Outcome
average pod yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
27.85e0
Comparator
RTNM treatmente0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compared with that after RTNM treatment, the average pod yield after GMMF and GMNM treatments increased by 27.85 and 21.26%, respectively, due to increases in the pods per plant and plant numbers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1965–2161
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–102

Title

Effects of Soil Tillage, Management Practices, and Mulching Film Application on Soil Health and Peanut Yield in a Continuous Cropping System

Dongqing Yang; Yan Liu; Ying Wang; et al. Frontiers in Microbiology 2020. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2020.570924

Other claims from this paper (17)

Record rev-e8b42d9843da442e0daaf76a188eefa833a9d2db2566cf8aa93932f09827c062 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 14 in the model’s answer

mulching · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

69 papers: 66 positive, 3 negative or no effect

65 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

60 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

fertilization · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

683 papers: 635 positive, 48 negative or no effect

634 papers in the same direction as this claim · 44 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

674 papers more in this group

See all 683 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.