Intervention effectmodel-written summary

GMNM and GMMF decreased intercellular carbon dioxide concentration relative to RTNM.

A claim from Effects of Soil Tillage, Management Practices, and Mulching Film Application on Soil Health and Peanut Yield in a Continuous Cropping System · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GMNM and GMMF decreased intercellular carbon dioxide concentration relative to RTNM.

Organ / stage
leafe0
Treatment
GMNM and GMMF treatmentse0
Outcome
intercellular carbon dioxide concentratione0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
RTNM treatmente0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with RTNM treatment, GMNM and GMMF treatments significantly increased photosynthesis rate in the peanut leaf and decreased intercellular carbon dioxide concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1765–1940

Title

Effects of Soil Tillage, Management Practices, and Mulching Film Application on Soil Health and Peanut Yield in a Continuous Cropping System

Dongqing Yang; Yan Liu; Ying Wang; et al. Frontiers in Microbiology 2020. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2020.570924

Other claims from this paper (17)

Record rev-336d17a07e46c1701cf9743eb00d1179308648832a8b4a48a1a53d6e75b019b1 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 13 in the model’s answer

mulching · molecular: metabolites · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

33 papers: 33 positive, 0 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.