Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Releasing only N. californicus at a 1:1 predator to prey ratio in 1997 did not significantly affect BGM populations in corn.

A claim from Survey and evaluation of native and released predators of the Banks grass mite (Acari: Tetranychidae) in corn and surrounding vegetation. · 2000

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Releasing only N. californicus at a 1:1 predator to prey ratio in 1997 did not significantly affect BGM populations in corn.

Taxon
field corne0
Treatment
N. californicus at a 1:1 predator to prey ratioe2
Interactor
BGMe2pest
Second interactor
N. californicusNeoseiulus californicuse2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
BGM populationse2
Direction
did not have a significant impacte2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Neoseiulus californicus
Neoseiulus californicus · Second interactor余世文 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Banks grass mite (BGM), Oligonychus pratensis (Banks), is an economically important pest in field corn, Zea mays L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1988–2107
e2

“Releases in 1997 of only N. californicus at a 1:1 predator to prey ratio also did not have a significant impact on BGM populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–912

Title

Survey and evaluation of native and released predators of the Banks grass mite (Acari: Tetranychidae) in corn and surrounding vegetation.

Matthew T. Messenger; Lawrent L. Buschman; James R. Nechols Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 2000

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-11c2bb5b59ce40f0f76e2b5154d91ea5fefb7c4cccd0403c25e5c0b7994965a9 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

Neoseiulus californicus · pest · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

biocontrol · pest · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 9 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.