Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Triple bags containing botanical leaves had significantly lower grain damage than polypropylene and plain triple-bag controls.

A claim from Evolution of Merchantability during Storage of Maize Triple Bagged Containing Biopesticides (Lippia multiflora and Hyptis suaveolens) · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Triple bags containing botanical leaves had significantly lower grain damage than polypropylene and plain triple-bag controls.

Treatment
triple bagged bags with different proportions of biopesticidee0
Outcome
damagee0
Direction
lowere0
Value
0.99±0.02% to 3.96± 0.01%e0
Comparator
Polypropylene woven sample bag (TPPB0) and in the triple bagged control bage0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“moisture levels (from 09.02±0.11% to 12.07± 0.06%), weight loss (from 0.49±0.02% to 2.54±0.07%) and damage (from 0.99±0.02% to 3.96± 0.01%), corn stored in triple bagged bags with different proportions of biopesticide were significantly lower than those recorded in the Polypropylene woven sample bag (TPPB0) and in the triple bagged control bag during the storage period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1690–2062

Title

Evolution of Merchantability during Storage of Maize Triple Bagged Containing Biopesticides (Lippia multiflora and Hyptis suaveolens)

Yao Vanessa Gaël; Konan K. Constant; Niamketchi G. Leonce; et al. European Journal of Nutrition & Food Safety 2020. doi:10.9734/ejnfs/2019/v11i430175

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-59dc9147a697944d8e4e76c82ef6bb72809abec16646c96fe35de623f3beb0ae · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

biocontrol · pest · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 9 positive, 5 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.