Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Zineb spray increased wheat grain size.

A claim from Effect of Fungicidal Folliar Sprays on Grain Quality in Wheat · 1969

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zineb spray increased wheat grain size.

Treatment
fungicidal spray treatmente0
Outcome
grain sizee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fungicidal spray treatment resulted in increased grain size”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 166–229
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–61

Title

Effect of Fungicidal Folliar Sprays on Grain Quality in Wheat

S. P. Kohli; H. P. Sikder; K. L. Sethi Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding (The) 1969

Other claims from this paper (1)

Record rev-132cdff473823b96710ec3a663ec3dc05001735d20ef2d9a2650e5896a5a3684 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

fungicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

262 papers: 232 positive, 30 negative or no effect

231 papers in the same direction as this claim · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    Chlorothalonil reduced aboveground spring wheat dry matter yield.

    The influence of chlorothalonil on the activity of soil microorganisms and enzymes · 2018

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    One and two fungicide sprays did not differ significantly in increasing wheat grain yield.

    Reduction of Winter Wheat Yield Losses Caused by Stripe Rust through Fungicide Management · 2016 · compared with One

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Fungicides did not change kernel weight.

    Fungicide and Nitrogen Effects on Winter Wheat under Low Foliar Disease Severity · 1989

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    In 1998, without disease, fungicides did not significantly increase wheat yield.

    Fungicide efficacy and the impact of stripe rust on spring and winter wheat in South Africa · 2003

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    In 2008, when leaf rust was very low, fungicide application had a slightly negative effect on yield overall.

    Comparative yield, disease resistance and response to fungicide for forty-five historic Canadian wheat cultivars · 2013

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    The combined chlormequat and carbendazim yield gain was usually less than the sum of their separate gains.

    The effect of chlormequat chloride formulated with choline chloride on the height and yield of winter wheat · 1981 · compared with the two products applied separately

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Most propiconazole and herbicide combinations reduced wheat grain yield relative to isolated application or untreated control.

    Response of Wheat Plants to Combinations of Herbicides with Insecticides and Fungicides · 2019 · compared with their isolated application or to control without application

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    At Apache, fungicide did not change mean grain yield of intermediate or resistant cultivars.

    Agronomic and Economic Response of Hard Red Winter Wheat to Foliar Fungicide in the Southern Plains · 2012

    Opposite direction

253 papers more in this group

See all 262 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

794 papers in the same direction as this claim · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Foliar N applications showed no consistent increase or decrease in grain yield, straw yield or straw N.

    Influence of Late‐Season Foliar Nitrogen Applications on Yield and Grain Nitrogen in Winter Wheat · 2002

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Boot-stage foliar N significantly reduced grain yield of hard red spring wheat by 5%.

    Foliar Nitrogen Application Timing Influence on Grain Yield and Protein Concentration of Hard Red Winter and Spring Wheat · 2003

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    soil application of Fe-EDDHA did not significantly affect wheat dry matter yield.

    Interaction of Iron with Copper, Zinc, and Manganese in Wheat as Affected by Iron and Manganese in a Calcareous Soil · 2008

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    One and two fungicide sprays did not differ significantly in increasing wheat grain yield.

    Reduction of Winter Wheat Yield Losses Caused by Stripe Rust through Fungicide Management · 2016 · compared with One

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Boot stage foliar nitrogen reduced spring wheat grain yield by 5%.

    Foliar Nitrogen Application Timing Influence on Grain Yield and Protein Concentration of Hard Red Winter and Spring Wheat · 2003

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Foliar Zn had no significant effect on wheat grain yield.

    Foliar zinc fertilization improves the zinc nutritional value of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grain · 2011

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Nano-N plus nano-Zn with 75% conventional N gave wheat and maize grain yield at par with full conventional fertilizer.

    Changes in microbial community structure and yield responses with the use of nano-fertilizers of nitrogen and zinc in wheat–maize system · 2024 · compared with N 100 PK

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Starting sprays eight weeks after emergence increased yield losses versus starting at emergence.

    Role of winter-active aphids spreading Barley yellow dwarf virus in decreasing wheat yields in a Mediterranean-type environment · 2005 · compared with regular applications started at emergence

    Opposite direction

868 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.