Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Weed density and dry weed biomass were lowest under hand weeding in wheat.

A claim from ALLELOPATHIC EFFECT OF CONGRESS GRASS ON WEEDS AND YIELD OF WHEAT · 2012

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed density and dry weed biomass were lowest under hand weeding in wheat.

Treatment
hand weedinge3
Interactor
weede3weed
Outcome
weed density and dry weed biomasse3
Direction
minimume3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“YIELD OF WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–65
e3

“While, weed density and dry weed biomass were minimum in hand weeding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–829

Title

ALLELOPATHIC EFFECT OF CONGRESS GRASS ON WEEDS AND YIELD OF WHEAT

Khaliq Noor; Ejaz Ahmad Khan; Mohammad Safdar Baloch; et al. JOURNAL OF WEED SCIENCE RESEARCH 2012

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-13bea8bce37faffe4ad672e714b170c5f5c8572abc9f9d7058929a6eb5712410 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

herbicide · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

401 papers: 362 positive, 39 negative or no effect

361 papers in the same direction as this claim · 34 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
    Wheat weed control was lower with residue retention without herbicides than with herbicide.

    Influence of Straw Management on Phalaris minor Retz. Control · 2009 · compared with herbicide application (sulfosulfuron 25 g/ha+metsulfuron 3 g/ha)

    Opposite direction

  8. negative

392 papers more in this group

See all 401 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.