Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Applying recommended K with recommended NP increased the agronomic efficiency of P and K by 34% relative to N alone.

A claim from Balanced fertilization in rice (Oryza sativa)groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) cropping system · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying recommended K with recommended NP increased the agronomic efficiency of P and K by 34% relative to N alone.

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa L.)groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)Oryza sativae0
Treatment
when the recommended quantity of P or K was applied with recommended quantity of NK or NPe1
Outcome
The AE of P and Ke1
Direction
increasede1
Value
34e1
Comparator
instead of with N alonee1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to study the response of rice (Oryza sativa L.)groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) cropping system to balanced nutrient application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–278
e1

“The AE of P and K increased by 40 and 34% in ricegroundnut system when the recommended quantity of P or K was applied with recommended quantity of NK or NP instead of with N alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1302

Title

Balanced fertilization in rice (Oryza sativa)groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) cropping system

A.K. PATRA; L.M. GARNAYAK; K.N. MISHRA; et al. Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v64i3.5272

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-15a2ecfacf58ba3337268028acbf11c27533b64b848a268a8ec70ce14c1a224a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer

nanoparticle · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.