Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Nano-cobalt spray gave the highest agronomic efficiency.

A claim from Effect of Silica, Bio-Organic Fertilizers, and Spraying of Nano-Titanium and Nano-Cobalt on the Growth and Yield of Rice · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano-cobalt spray gave the highest agronomic efficiency.

Treatment
nano-cobalt spraye0
Outcome
agronomic efficiencye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
(4270.8) kg kg-1e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–120
e0

“The nano-cobalt spray recorded the highest agronomic efficiency (4270.8) kg kg-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1603–1684

Title

Effect of Silica, Bio-Organic Fertilizers, and Spraying of Nano-Titanium and Nano-Cobalt on the Growth and Yield of Rice

Ameer Eamad Neamah AL-Sultanei; Hayyawi Wewa Attia Al-Juthery IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science 2022. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1060/1/012034

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-67b4adbd178e2b28ebb1036d446938f7be3eec42fdbbd9ab30f230a7916395e5 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

nanoparticle · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

application · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.