Paper · 2020 · Scientific Reports

P-dipping of rice seedlings increases applied P use efficiency in high P-fixing soils

Aung Zaw Oo; Yasuhiro Tsujimoto; Njato Mickaël Rakotoarisoa; et al.

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
32
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Applied phosphorus (P) use efficiency is generally low due to the low mobility of P in soil and its affinity to form insoluble complexes. Localized P application nearby the root zone is a potential approach to overcome this issue in crop production. However, the interaction with soil conditions is little understood, which results in less effective application of this approach. Using root-box experiments and changing P-retention capacity of soils, we revealed that applied P use efficiency of rice can be substantially improved by dipping seedlings in P-enriched slurry at transplanting (P-dipping) even in highly P-fixing soils. Spatial analysis of soluble P in soils indicated that P-dipping creates a P hotspot because the P-enriched slurry is transferred with seedling roots. The P hotspot could have induced vigorous surface root and facilitated further P uptake from the spot. In contrast, the effect of conventional P incorporation depended on P-retention capacity of soils; no increases in soluble P content in soils or plant P uptakes were observed when P-retention capacity was high. Our finding of significant interaction between localized P application and a specific soil property should help improving applied P use efficiency and achieving sustainable rice production against depleting P fertilizer resources.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P dipping substantially improved applied phosphorus use efficiency even in highly P fixing soils.

Treatment
dipping seedlings in P-enriched slurry at transplanting (P-dipping)e0
Outcome
applied P use efficiencye0
Direction
improvede0
Setting
highly P-fixing soilse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“applied P use efficiency of rice can be substantially improved by dipping seedlings in P-enriched slurry at transplanting (P-dipping) even in highly P-fixing soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–631 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P dipping created a soil P hotspot through transfer of slurry on seedling roots.

Treatment
P-dippinge0
Outcome
P hotspote0
Qualifier
P-enriched slurry is transferred with seedling rootse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P-dipping creates a P hotspot because the P-enriched slurry is transferred with seedling roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–781 · show in text ↑
e1

“applied P use efficiency of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–500 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The P hotspot may have induced vigorous surface roots and further P uptake.

Outcome
vigorous surface root and facilitated further P uptakee0
Qualifier
P hotspote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The P hotspot could have induced vigorous surface root and facilitated further P uptake from the spot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–884 · show in text ↑
e1

“applied P use efficiency of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–500 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The effect of conventional P incorporation depended on soil P retention capacity.

Outcome
effect of conventional P incorporatione0
Setting
P-retention capacity of soilse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effect of conventional P incorporation depended on P-retention capacity of soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–983 · show in text ↑
e1

“applied P use efficiency of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–500 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At high soil P retention, conventional P incorporation did not increase soil soluble P.

Treatment
conventional P incorporatione1
Outcome
soluble P content in soilse0
Direction
no increasese0
Setting
P-retention capacity was highe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no increases in soluble P content in soils or plant P uptakes were observed when P-retention capacity was high”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1095 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–27 · show in text ↑
e1

“conventional P incorporation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–941 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At high soil P retention, conventional P incorporation did not increase plant P uptake.

Treatment
conventional P incorporatione1
Outcome
plant P uptakese0
Direction
no increasese0
Setting
P-retention capacity was highe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no increases in soluble P content in soils or plant P uptakes were observed when P-retention capacity was high”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1095 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–27 · show in text ↑
e1

“conventional P incorporation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–941 · show in text ↑

application · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

transplanting · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 16 positive, 2 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

220 papers: 202 positive, 18 negative or no effect

201 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

216 papers more in this group

See all 220 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.