Intervention effectmodel-written summary

pendimethalin + dimethenamid-P fb imazamox + bentazon produced the highest dry bean yield.

A claim from Influence of planting date and herbicide program on Amaranthus palmeri control in dry bean · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

pendimethalin + dimethenamid-P fb imazamox + bentazon produced the highest dry bean yield.

Taxon
dry beant0
Treatment
pendimethalin + dimethenamid-P fb imazamox + bentazone0
Outcome
dry bean yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“The treatments EPTC + ethalfluralin, EPTC + ethalfluralin followed by (fb) imazamox + bentazon, and pendimethalin + dimethenamid-P fb imazamox + bentazon, resulted in the lowest Palmer amaranth density at 3 wk after treatment and the highest dry bean yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1259
t0

“dry bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–90

Title

Influence of planting date and herbicide program on Amaranthus palmeri control in dry bean

Clint W. Beiermann; Cody F. Creech; Stevan Z. Knezevic; et al. Weed Technology 2021. doi:10.1017/wet.2021.96

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-182a14505f28290379b34fd38385830de0873fef106d1374758db7af537856e9 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

bentazone · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results differ

9 papers: 4 positive, 5 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    POST imazamox plus bentazon reduced seed yield relative to PRE dimethenamid-P.

    Integrating Irrigation, Tillage, and Herbicides for Weed Control in Dry Bean · 2014 · compared with dimethenamid-P

    Opposite directionCited by this paper

  2. no effect
    Imazethapyr at 37.5 or 75 g/ha combined with bentazon at 840 g/ha had no adverse effect on dry bean maturity and yield.

    Response of Pinto and Small Red Mexican Bean to Postemergence Herbicides · 2008

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Bentazone had no significant effect on bean growth or yield in one experiment.

    Phytotoxicity of several pre-emergence and post-emergence herbicides to green beans ( Phaseolus vulgaris ) · 1993

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Bentazon at the label rate reduced yield by 33% at Exeter in 2001.

    Tolerance of kidney beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) to bentazon alone and when mixed with imazamox · 2005

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Bentazon plus fomesafen reduced yield to 77% of untreated control.

    Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Response to Postemergence Herbicides at Different Growth Stages · 2025 · compared with untreated control

    Opposite direction

  6. positive
    Bentazon added to cloransulam-methyl raised dry bean yield by 0.16 t·ha–1 at Exeter in 2009.

    Safening effect of bentazon on cloransulam-methyl and halosulfuron-methyl in dry bean · 2012

    Same direction

  7. positive
    The mixture imazamox + bentazon + fomesafen (230 + 600 + 125 g ha-1 of a.i.) gave greater efficiency in avoiding grain yield losses in common bean.

    Efficacy of tank mixtures of post-emergence herbicides in common bean · 2021

    Same direction

  8. positive
    The POST halosulfuron-methyl + bentazon tank mix gave the highest net benefit in dry bean over two seasons.

    Efficacy of certain herbicides in dry bean crop · 2023 · compared with hand hoeing treatment and pendimethalin fb bentazon

    Same direction

See all 9 papers →

dimethenamid-P · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    Dimethenamid-p at 220 and 440 g ai ha-1 caused no adverse effect on plant stand, shoot dry weight, height and yield of black, white, adzuki and kidney bean.

    Sensitivity of Dry Bean to Dimethenamid-p, Saflufenacil and Dimethenamid-p/Saflufenacil · 2014

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    The other three herbicides caused no decrease in bean stand count or seed yield.

    Dry Bean Sensitivity to Group 15 Herbicides Applied Preemergence · 2018

    Opposite direction

See all 3 papers →

imazamox · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 2 positive, 5 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    POST imazamox plus bentazon reduced seed yield relative to PRE dimethenamid-P.

    Integrating Irrigation, Tillage, and Herbicides for Weed Control in Dry Bean · 2014 · compared with dimethenamid-P

    Opposite directionCited by this paper

  2. negative
    Imazamox plus fomesafen reduced snap bean yield only in 2000.

    Snap Bean Tolerance to Herbicides in Ontario · 2004

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Imazamox plus fomesafen at the label rate reduced yield by 22% at Exeter in 2001.

    Tolerance of kidney beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) to bentazon alone and when mixed with imazamox · 2005

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Imazamox reduced yield to 76% of untreated control.

    Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Response to Postemergence Herbicides at Different Growth Stages · 2025 · compared with untreated control

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    The malathion and imazamox combination reduced pod and grain numbers per plant.

    Role of cytochrome P450 in herbicides tolerance of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) · 2026

    Opposite direction

  6. positive
    The mixture imazamox + bentazon + fomesafen (230 + 600 + 125 g ha-1 of a.i.) gave greater efficiency in avoiding grain yield losses in common bean.

    Efficacy of tank mixtures of post-emergence herbicides in common bean · 2021

    Same direction

See all 7 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.