Claim · model-written summary
Hudan 4, Shanzi 1 and Yedan 19 were high-efficiency, high-response types.
Zea maysNot reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Hudan 4,Shanzi 1 and Yedan 19 belonged to H-H type(high N use efficiency with high N responsiveness)”
e1“Hudan 4,Shanzi 1 and Yedan 19 belonged to H-H type(high N use efficiency with high N responsiveness)”
e2“summer maize varieties”
Title
Genotypic variation in nitrogen use efficiency in summer maize
Bingnian Zhai Plant Nutrition and Fertilizing Science 2006
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Observation Grain yield varied significantly among maize varieties at all nitrogen rates.
- Observation Biological yield varied significantly among varieties at all nitrogen rates.
- Observation Harvest index, nitrogen efficiency and responsiveness also varied among genotypes.
- Observation Tested varieties were classified into four nitrogen efficiency and responsiveness types.
- Observation Zhongdan 2 and Yuyu 22 were low-efficiency, low-response types.
- Observation Shandan16, Shandan 902 and Hudan 2000 were high-efficiency, low-response types.
- Observation Shandan 9 and Nongda108 were low-efficiency, high-response types.
- Association Nitrogen accumulation did not accurately reflect nitrogen use efficiency.
- Association The contribution of nitrogen utilization efficiency to nitrogen use efficiency depended on nitrogen rate.
- Method / resource Nitrogen index reflected nitrogen use efficiency at all nitrogen rates.