Claim · model-written summary
Tested varieties were classified into four nitrogen efficiency and responsiveness types.
- Outcome
- four different typese0
Zea maysNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The tested maize varieties could be classified into four different types based on their nitrogen efficiency and nitrogen responsiveness.”
Title
Genotypic variation in nitrogen use efficiency in summer maize
Bingnian Zhai Plant Nutrition and Fertilizing Science 2006
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Observation Grain yield varied significantly among maize varieties at all nitrogen rates.
- Observation Biological yield varied significantly among varieties at all nitrogen rates.
- Observation Harvest index, nitrogen efficiency and responsiveness also varied among genotypes.
- Observation Hudan 4, Shanzi 1 and Yedan 19 were high-efficiency, high-response types.
- Observation Zhongdan 2 and Yuyu 22 were low-efficiency, low-response types.
- Observation Shandan16, Shandan 902 and Hudan 2000 were high-efficiency, low-response types.
- Observation Shandan 9 and Nongda108 were low-efficiency, high-response types.
- Association Nitrogen accumulation did not accurately reflect nitrogen use efficiency.
- Association The contribution of nitrogen utilization efficiency to nitrogen use efficiency depended on nitrogen rate.
- Method / resource Nitrogen index reflected nitrogen use efficiency at all nitrogen rates.