Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Adding Ni up to 0.5 mg L−1 did not change fruit Ni concentration in urea-fed cucumber.

A claim from Supplements of Nickel Affect Yield, Quality, and Nitrogen Metabolism When Urea or Nitrate is the Sole Nitrogen Source for Cucumber · 2009

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding Ni up to 0.5 mg L−1 did not change fruit Ni concentration in urea-fed cucumber.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Ni up to 0.5 mg L−1e0
Outcome
fruit Ni concentratione0
Direction
no effecte0
Qualifier
ureae0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Additions of Ni up to 0.5 mg L−1 had no effect on the fruit Ni concentration in the both urea and nitrate-fed plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–789
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–130

Title

Supplements of Nickel Affect Yield, Quality, and Nitrogen Metabolism When Urea or Nitrate is the Sole Nitrogen Source for Cucumber

S. J. Tabatabaei Journal of Plant Nutrition 2009. doi:10.1080/01904160902787834

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-18fac38b2ebb5080ab05b387cd8aa78889cead937023b299f0b6b14be3e99ea0 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

nickel atom · nutrient: content · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.