Paper · 2009 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Supplements of Nickel Affect Yield, Quality, and Nitrogen Metabolism When Urea or Nitrate is the Sole Nitrogen Source for Cucumber

S. J. Tabatabaei

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
20
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT Influences of nickel (Ni) concentrations in the nutrient solution on yield, quality, and nitrogen (N) metabolism of cucumber plants (Cucumis sativus cv ‘RS189’ and ‘Vikima’) were evaluated when plants were grown either with urea or nitrate as the sole N source. The cucumber plants were treated with two N sources, urea and nitrate as sodium nitrate (NaNO3) at 200 mg L−1, and three concentrations of Ni as nickel sulfate (NiSO4·6H2O; 0, 0.5, and 1 mg L−1). Treatments were arranged in a randomized block design with six replicates. The highest concentration of Ni in the leaves (1.2 mg kg−1 Dwt) was observed in the urea-fed plants at 1 mg L−1 Ni concentration. Additions of Ni up to 0.5 mg L−1 had no effect on the fruit Ni concentration in the both urea and nitrate-fed plants. Yield significantly (p < 0.05) increased with the Ni supplements from 0 to 0.5 mg L−1 (10 and 15% in ‘RS189’ and ‘Vikima’, respectively), but decreased when 1 mg L−1 Ni applied to the solutions in urea-fed plants. Nitrate-fed plants had a higher percentage of total soluble solids compare to those urea-fed plants. Nitrate concentrations of the fruits in urea-fed plants in both cultivars were reduced by approximately 50% compared to those nitrate-fed plants. The reduction of nitrate concentration in the fruits became more pronounced as the Ni concentration increased in the solution. The rate of photosynthesis (Pn) increased with the increase of the Ni concentration in the solution with urea-fed plants. Both N concentration and nitrate reductase (NR) activity of young leaves were higher in urea-fed plants at 0.5 mg l−1 Ni concentration. Ni supplements enhanced the growth and yield of urea-fed plants by increasing Pn, N concentration and NR activity. It can be concluded that Ni supplements (0.5 mg l−1) improve yield, quality, and NR activity in urea-fed cucumber plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf nickel concentration was highest at 1.2 mg kg−1 dry weight in urea-fed plants receiving 1 mg L−1 Ni.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
1 mg L−1 Nie0
Outcome
concentration of Ni in the leavese0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.2 mg kg−1 Dwte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest concentration of Ni in the leaves (1.2 mg kg−1 Dwt) was observed in the urea-fed plants at 1 mg L−1 Ni concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–671 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding Ni up to 0.5 mg L−1 did not change fruit Ni concentration in urea-fed cucumber.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Ni up to 0.5 mg L−1e0
Outcome
fruit Ni concentratione0
Direction
no effecte0
Qualifier
ureae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Additions of Ni up to 0.5 mg L−1 had no effect on the fruit Ni concentration in the both urea and nitrate-fed plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–789 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding Ni up to 0.5 mg L−1 did not change fruit Ni concentration in nitrate-fed cucumber.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Ni up to 0.5 mg L−1e0
Outcome
fruit Ni concentratione0
Direction
no effecte0
Qualifier
nitrate-fede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Additions of Ni up to 0.5 mg L−1 had no effect on the fruit Ni concentration in the both urea and nitrate-fed plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–789 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing Ni from 0 to 0.5 mg L−1 significantly raised yield by 10% in RS189.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Material
‘RS189’e0
Treatment
Ni supplements from 0 to 0.5 mg L−1e0
Outcome
Yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10e0
Comparator
0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield significantly (p < 0.05) increased with the Ni supplements from 0 to 0.5 mg L−1 (10 and 15% in ‘RS189’ and ‘Vikima’, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–926 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing Ni from 0 to 0.5 mg L−1 significantly raised yield by 15% in Vikima.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Material
‘Vikima’e0
Treatment
Ni supplements from 0 to 0.5 mg L−1e0
Outcome
Yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
15%e0
Comparator
0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield significantly (p < 0.05) increased with the Ni supplements from 0 to 0.5 mg L−1 (10 and 15% in ‘RS189’ and ‘Vikima’, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–926 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield decreased at 1 mg L−1 Ni in urea-fed cucumber.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
1 mg L−1 Nie0
Outcome
Yielde1
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
urea-fed plantse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but decreased when 1 mg L−1 Ni applied to the solutions in urea-fed plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1002 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–130 · show in text ↑
e1

“Yield significantly (p < 0.05) increased with the Ni supplements from 0 to 0.5 mg L−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–875 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate-fed cucumber had higher total soluble solids than urea-fed plants.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Nitrate-fede0
Outcome
percentage of total soluble solidse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
urea-fed plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrate-fed plants had a higher percentage of total soluble solids compare to those urea-fed plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1004–1104 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit nitrate concentrations in urea-fed cucumber were about 50% below nitrate-fed plants in both cultivars.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Organ / stage
fruitse0
Treatment
urea-fede0
Outcome
Nitrate concentrations of the fruitse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
approximately 50%e0
Comparator
nitrate-fed plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrate concentrations of the fruits in urea-fed plants in both cultivars were reduced by approximately 50% compared to those nitrate-fed plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1250 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–130 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing solution Ni made the reduction in cucumber fruit nitrate concentration more pronounced.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Ni concentratione0
Outcome
reduction of nitrate concentration in the fruitse0
Direction
more pronouncede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The reduction of nitrate concentration in the fruits became more pronounced as the Ni concentration increased in the solution.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1377 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–130 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthesis rate increased with Ni concentration in urea-fed cucumber.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Ni concentratione0
Outcome
rate of photosynthesis (Pn)e0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
urea-fed plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The rate of photosynthesis (Pn) increased with the increase of the Ni concentration in the solution with urea-fed plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1378–1499 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–130 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Young-leaf N concentration was higher in urea-fed cucumber at 0.5 mg l−1 Ni.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Organ / stage
young leavese0
Treatment
0.5 mg l−1 Nie0
Outcome
N concentratione0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both N concentration and nitrate reductase (NR) activity of young leaves were higher in urea-fed plants at 0.5 mg l−1 Ni concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1500–1635 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–130 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Young-leaf nitrate reductase activity was higher in urea-fed cucumber at 0.5 mg l−1 Ni.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Organ / stage
young leavese0
Treatment
0.5 mg l−1 Nie0
Gene
nitrate reductase (NR)e0
Outcome
nitrate reductase (NR) activitye0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both N concentration and nitrate reductase (NR) activity of young leaves were higher in urea-fed plants at 0.5 mg l−1 Ni concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1500–1635 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–130 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attributed enhanced growth and yield under Ni supplementation in urea-fed cucumber to higher photosynthesis, nitrogen concentration and nitrate reductase activity.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Ni supplementse0
Outcome
growth and yielde0
Qualifier
by increasing Pn, N concentration and NR activitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ni supplements enhanced the growth and yield of urea-fed plants by increasing Pn, N concentration and NR activity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1636–1750 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–130 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that 0.5 mg l−1 Ni supplements improve yield, quality and nitrate reductase activity in urea-fed cucumber.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
Ni supplements (0.5 mg l−1)e0
Outcome
improve yield, quality, and NR activitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It can be concluded that Ni supplements (0.5 mg l−1) improve yield, quality, and NR activity in urea-fed cucumber plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1751–1872 · show in text ↑

nickel atom · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results differ

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

nickel atom · nutrient: content · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

nitrogen · quality: sugar starch · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 10 positive, 7 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.