Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Pyroxasulfone showed excellent activity against grass weeds at lower application rates than commercial herbicides.

A claim from Development of the novel pre-emergence herbicide pyroxasulfone · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pyroxasulfone showed excellent activity against grass weeds at lower application rates than commercial herbicides.

Treatment
Pyroxasulfonee1
Interactor
grasse1weed
Outcome
herbicidal activity against grasse1
Direction
excellente1
Qualifier
lower application ratese1
Comparator
other commercial herbicidese1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat, corn, and soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–234
e1

“Pyroxasulfone inhibits the biosynthesis of very-long-chain fatty acids in plants and has shown excellent herbicidal activity against grass and broadleaf weeds at lower application rates compared with other commercial herbicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–463

Title

Development of the novel pre-emergence herbicide pyroxasulfone

Masao Nakatani; Yoshihiro Yamaji; Hisashi Honda; et al. Journal of Pesticide Science 2016. doi:10.1584/jpestics.j16-05

Other claims from this paper (2)

Record rev-1967e781fd5d447d7ca5b2e1acd1425ac78cb6bd41196a16f0abc76138f58539 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

pyroxasulfone · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Pyroxasulfone at lower application rates showed excellent herbicidal activity compared with S-metolachlor.

    Weed control efficacy of a novel herbicide, pyroxasulfone · 2014 · compared with S-metolachlor

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. positive
    Pyroxasulfone tank mixed with metsulfuron controlled 96.5%–99.8% of diverse weeds.

    Weed control in wheat with pyroxasulfone and its combinations with other herbicides · 2023 · compared with untreated weedy control

    Same directionCites this paper

  3. negative
    Pyroxasulfone gave poor weed control

    Comparative efficacy of different post-Emergence herbicides in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). · 2012

    Opposite direction

  4. positive
    Pyroxasulfone plus metribuzin at 127.5 + 280 g a.i./ha significantly reduced monocot and dicot weed density and dry weight.

    Efficacy of pyroxasulfone and its combinations against weeds in wheat (Triticum aestivum) · 2024

    Same direction

  5. positive
    Pyroxasulfone followed by metsulfuron plus carfentrazone gave higher weed control efficiency among weed management options.

    Controlling Phalaris minor with novel pyroxasulfone under conservation agriculture in the north-western Indo-Gangetic Plains · 2024 · compared with weed management options

    Same direction

  6. positive
    Cover crops terminated with glyphosate plus residual herbicide reduced weed density by 52% to 80% for at least 90 days.

    Combined effects of spring-planted cover crops and residual herbicide on weed suppression and subsequent wheat yield in the semiarid Central Great Plains · 2025 · compared with weedy fallow

    Same direction

  7. positive
    Pyroxasulfone minimized weed population and dry weight in subsequent wheat.

    Enhancing profitability and sustainability through herbicides on weed control in wheat-greengram cropping system in Punjab, India · 2023

    Same direction

  8. positive
    Pyroxasulfone plus metribuzin had the highest weed control efficiency, 67.10.

    Efficiency of pre and post-emergence herbicides to control weeds and enhancing yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum) in North-East India · 2024

    Same direction

5 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.