Paper · 2025 · Weed Science

Combined effects of spring-planted cover crops and residual herbicide on weed suppression and subsequent wheat yield in the semiarid Central Great Plains

Sachin Dhanda; Vipan Kumar

7
claims
11
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract Cover crops (CCs) are a component of the integrated weed management strategies for controlling herbicide-resistant weed biotypes. A field study was conducted at Kansas State University Agricultural Research Center near Hays, KS, from 2021 to 2024 to determine the effect of spring-planted CCs in combination with residual herbicide on weed suppression during fallow phase and subsequent wheat yield in a no-till winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)–grain sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]–fallow rotation in the semiarid Central Great Plains (CGP). The study site had a natural seedbank of glyphosate-resistant (GR) kochia [ Bassia scoparia (L.) A.J. Scott] and Palmer amaranth ( Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson). A mixture of CCs (oats [ Avena sativa L.]–barley [ Hordeum vulgare L.]–spring peas [ Pisum sativum L.]) was spring-planted in no-till sorghum stubbles and terminated at the oats heading stage. Four treatments were tested: (1) weedy fallow (no CC and no herbicide), (2) chemical fallow (no CC but glyphosate + flumioxazin/pyroxasulfone + dicamba), (3) CC terminated with glyphosate, and (4) CC terminated with glyphosate + flumioxazin/pyroxasulfone. Across 3 yr, CC at termination reduced total weed density by 78% to 99% and total weed biomass by 93% to 99% compared with weedy fallow. Weed suppression by the CC terminated with glyphosate plus flumioxazin/pyroxasulfone continued for at least 90 d with reduced total weed density of 52% to 80% and total weed biomass reduction by 70% compared with weedy fallow across 3 yr. No differences in subsequent wheat grain yield between CC treatments and chemical fallow were recorded in 2021 to 2022 and 2022 to 2023; however, in 2023 to 2024, chemical fallow and CC terminated with glyphosate + flumioxazin/pyroxasulfone had greater wheat yield than CC terminated with glyphosate only. These results suggest that integration of spring-planted CC with residual herbicide may help suppress GR B. scoparia and A. palmeri in the CGP.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cover crops reduced total weed density at termination by 78% to 99%.

Treatment
CC at terminatione0
Outcome
total weed densitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
78% to 99%e0
Comparator
weedy fallowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Across 3 yr, CC at termination reduced total weed density by 78% to 99% and total weed biomass by 93% to 99% compared with weedy fallow.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1310 · show in text ↑
e1

“subsequent wheat yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–407 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cover crops reduced total weed biomass at termination by 93% to 99%.

Treatment
CC at terminatione0
Outcome
total weed biomasse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
93% to 99%e0
Comparator
weedy fallowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Across 3 yr, CC at termination reduced total weed density by 78% to 99% and total weed biomass by 93% to 99% compared with weedy fallow.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1310 · show in text ↑
e1

“subsequent wheat yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–407 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cover crops terminated with glyphosate plus residual herbicide reduced weed density by 52% to 80% for at least 90 days.

Treatment
CC terminated with glyphosate plus flumioxazin/pyroxasulfonee0
Outcome
total weed densitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
52% to 80%e0
Qualifier
at least 90 de0
Comparator
weedy fallowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weed suppression by the CC terminated with glyphosate plus flumioxazin/pyroxasulfone continued for at least 90 d with reduced total weed density of 52% to 80% and total weed biomass reduction by 70% compared with weedy fallow across 3 yr.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1549 · show in text ↑
e1

“subsequent wheat yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–407 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined cover crop and herbicide treatment reduced weed biomass by 70%.

Treatment
CC terminated with glyphosate plus flumioxazin/pyroxasulfonee0
Outcome
total weed biomasse0
Direction
reductione0
Value
70%e0
Comparator
weedy fallowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weed suppression by the CC terminated with glyphosate plus flumioxazin/pyroxasulfone continued for at least 90 d with reduced total weed density of 52% to 80% and total weed biomass reduction by 70% compared with weedy fallow across 3 yr.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1549 · show in text ↑
e1

“subsequent wheat yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–407 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsequent wheat grain yield did not differ between cover crop treatments and chemical fallow in the first two seasons.

Treatment
CC treatmentse0
Outcome
subsequent wheat grain yielde0
Direction
No differencese0
Qualifier
2021 to 2022 and 2022 to 2023e0
Comparator
chemical fallowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No differences in subsequent wheat grain yield between CC treatments and chemical fallow were recorded in 2021 to 2022 and 2022 to 2023”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1550–1685 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2023 to 2024, chemical fallow yielded more wheat than cover crops terminated with glyphosate alone.

Treatment
chemical fallowe0
Outcome
wheat yielde0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
2023 to 2024e0
Comparator
CC terminated with glyphosate onlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in 2023 to 2024, chemical fallow and CC terminated with glyphosate + flumioxazin/pyroxasulfone had greater wheat yield than CC terminated with glyphosate only.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1696–1855 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2023 to 2024, cover crops with residual herbicide yielded more wheat than cover crops terminated with glyphosate alone.

Treatment
CC terminated with glyphosate + flumioxazin/pyroxasulfonee0
Outcome
wheat yielde0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
2023 to 2024e0
Comparator
CC terminated with glyphosate onlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in 2023 to 2024, chemical fallow and CC terminated with glyphosate + flumioxazin/pyroxasulfone had greater wheat yield than CC terminated with glyphosate only.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1696–1855 · show in text ↑

glyphosate · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

37 papers: 20 positive, 17 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

flumioxazin · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

pyroxasulfone · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

glyphosate · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 22 positive, 2 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

pyroxasulfone · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

18 papers: 18 positive, 0 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

rotation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

345 papers: 253 positive, 92 negative or no effect

252 papers in the same direction as this paper · 83 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

341 papers more in this group

See all 345 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.