Paper · 2024 · Revista Caatinga

Pre-emergent herbicide screening for wheat

Celso A. S. Teixeira; Ana P. W. Witter; Luiz A. I. Ferreira; et al.

11
claims
20
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

ABSTRACT Weed control is a challenge in crop management due to the limited number of registered herbicides, especially for preemergent application. This study aimed to investigate the selectivity of pre-emergent herbicides with different mechanisms of action for wheat. The experiment consisted of two stages: the first involved screening under greenhouse conditions, and the second assessing the selected treatments under field conditions, with a focus on crop yield. Plant phytointoxication, crop stand, and shoot dry weight were assessed in the greenhouse experiment, and tillering, crop stand, plant height, canopy closure, yield, 1000-grain weight, and hectoliter weight in the field. Under greenhouse conditions, [imazapic + imazapyr], pendimethalin, isoxaflutole, florpyrauxifen, and halosulfuron-methyl produced the best results and were selected for the field experiment. Florpyrauxifen was the only herbicide that was selective both in greenhouse and field experiments. Isoxaflutole and trifluralin did not damage wheat in any of the field evaluations. Despite reducing crop performance in some assessments, pendimethalin and flumioxazin provided yield, hectoliter weight, and 1000-grain weight results equivalent to the herbicide-free control. Florpyrauxifen (1.08 g ha-1) was the most promising herbicide. Trifluralin (900 g ha-1), pendimethalin (1750 g ha-1), isoxaflutole (60 g ha-1), and flumioxazin (40 and 60 g ha-1) also produced grain yields equivalent to the control without herbicide.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Florpyrauxifen was selective in greenhouse and field experiments.

Treatment
Florpyrauxifene0
Outcome
selective both in greenhouse and field experimentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Florpyrauxifen was the only herbicide that was selective both in greenhouse and field experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–978 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isoxaflutole did not damage wheat in field evaluations.

Treatment
Isoxaflutolee0
Outcome
damage wheate0
Direction
did not damagee0
Setting
field evaluationse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Isoxaflutole and trifluralin did not damage wheat in any of the field evaluations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1061 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trifluralin did not damage wheat in field evaluations.

Treatment
trifluraline0
Outcome
damage wheate0
Direction
did not damagee0
Setting
field evaluationse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Isoxaflutole and trifluralin did not damage wheat in any of the field evaluations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1061 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin produced yield and grain-weight measures equivalent to the herbicide-free control despite some crop-performance reductions.

Treatment
pendimethaline0
Outcome
yield, hectoliter weight, and 1000-grain weighte0
Direction
equivalente0
Qualifier
reducing crop performance in some assessmentse0
Comparator
herbicide-free controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Despite reducing crop performance in some assessments, pendimethalin and flumioxazin provided yield, hectoliter weight, and 1000-grain weight results equivalent to the herbicide-free control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1253 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flumioxazin produced yield and grain-weight measures equivalent to the herbicide-free control despite some crop-performance reductions.

Treatment
flumioxazine0
Outcome
yield, hectoliter weight, and 1000-grain weighte0
Direction
equivalente0
Qualifier
reducing crop performance in some assessmentse0
Comparator
herbicide-free controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Despite reducing crop performance in some assessments, pendimethalin and flumioxazin provided yield, hectoliter weight, and 1000-grain weight results equivalent to the herbicide-free control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1253 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–42 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Florpyrauxifen at 1.08 g ha-1 was deemed the most promising herbicide.

Treatment
Florpyrauxifen (1.08 g ha-1)e0
Outcome
most promising herbicidee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Florpyrauxifen (1.08 g ha-1) was the most promising herbicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1316 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trifluralin at 900 g ha-1 produced grain yield equivalent to no herbicide.

Treatment
Trifluralin (900 g ha-1)e0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
equivalente0
Comparator
control without herbicidee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Trifluralin (900 g ha-1), pendimethalin (1750 g ha-1), isoxaflutole (60 g ha-1), and flumioxazin (40 and 60 g ha-1) also produced grain yields equivalent to the control without herbicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1318–1504 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin at 1750 g ha-1 produced grain yield equivalent to no herbicide.

Treatment
pendimethalin (1750 g ha-1)e0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
equivalente0
Comparator
control without herbicidee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Trifluralin (900 g ha-1), pendimethalin (1750 g ha-1), isoxaflutole (60 g ha-1), and flumioxazin (40 and 60 g ha-1) also produced grain yields equivalent to the control without herbicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1318–1504 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isoxaflutole at 60 g ha-1 produced grain yield equivalent to no herbicide.

Treatment
isoxaflutole (60 g ha-1)e0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
equivalente0
Comparator
control without herbicidee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Trifluralin (900 g ha-1), pendimethalin (1750 g ha-1), isoxaflutole (60 g ha-1), and flumioxazin (40 and 60 g ha-1) also produced grain yields equivalent to the control without herbicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1318–1504 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flumioxazin at 40 and 60 g ha-1 produced grain yield equivalent to no herbicide.

Treatment
flumioxazin (40 and 60 g ha-1)e0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
equivalente0
Comparator
control without herbicidee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Trifluralin (900 g ha-1), pendimethalin (1750 g ha-1), isoxaflutole (60 g ha-1), and flumioxazin (40 and 60 g ha-1) also produced grain yields equivalent to the control without herbicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1318–1504 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–42 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five herbicides gave the best greenhouse screening results and were selected for field evaluation.

Outcome
produced the best results and were selected for the field experimente0
Setting
greenhouse conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under greenhouse conditions, [imazapic + imazapyr], pendimethalin, isoxaflutole, florpyrauxifen, and halosulfuron-methyl produced the best results and were selected for the field experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–879 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–42 · show in text ↑

trifluralin · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

9 papers: 4 positive, 5 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

pendimethalin · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

66 papers: 57 positive, 9 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

trifluralin · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

flumioxazin · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.