Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The 0.4-ppmw trifluralin rate caused only slight damage to wheat seedlings.

A claim from Effects of Trifluralin on Root Morphology and Mineral Status of Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Seedlings · 1984

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 0.4-ppmw trifluralin rate caused only slight damage to wheat seedlings.

Material
Neepawae1
Treatment
0.4-ppmw trifluraline3
Outcome
damage to the seedlingse3
Qualifier
only slighte3
Setting
Growth chambere0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorDirectionValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth chamber studies using one soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–37
e1

“wheat ( Triticum aestivum L. ‘Neepawa’) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–262
e3

“However, 0.4-ppmw trifluralin caused only slight damage to the seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–544

Title

Effects of Trifluralin on Root Morphology and Mineral Status of Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Seedlings

Barry M. Olson; Robert B. McKercher; Edward H. Halstead Weed Science 1984. doi:10.1017/s0043174500059178

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-ea3f7e06d33fdbe05f3466f203cc2c0a6c6981995989b4330f72ea5d00b5cd53 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

trifluralin · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.