Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Plastic mulch had highest benefit cost ratio of 2.21.

A claim from Effect of mulching practices and foliar nutrition on groundnut (Arachis hypogaea l.) productivity under raised bed method of cultivation · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic mulch had highest benefit cost ratio of 2.21.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
plastic mulche0
Outcome
B:Ce0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2.21e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plastic mulch recorded the highest pod yield (2320 kg/ha), haulm yield (4164 kg/ha), harvest index (0.36), gross returns (` 1,44,057/ha), net returns (` 78,879/ha) and B:C (2.21)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–698
t0

“groundnut (Arachis hypogaea l.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–84

Title

Effect of mulching practices and foliar nutrition on groundnut (Arachis hypogaea l.) productivity under raised bed method of cultivation

K N MAHANTHESHA; S N HONNALI; H KUMARASWAMY; et al. Journal of Oilseeds Research 2024. doi:10.56739/64869889

Other claims from this paper (17)

Record rev-19ccd5fcff027d2b6a33c35a71f1e71525b2cdc960e069f82d045cd7ec275622 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

mulching · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

69 papers: 66 positive, 3 negative or no effect

65 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Polythene mulching significantly enhanced oil yield of peanut over no mulch.

    Polythene mulching and fertigation in peanut (Arachis hypogaea): Effect on crop productivity, quality, water productivity and economic profitability · 2018 · compared with no mulch

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. negative
    Mulch from 71 to 113 days slightly reduced groundnut seed yield, without a significant difference from control.

    Effect of Transparent Polythene Mulch during the Reproductive Stages of Groundnut · 1995 · compared with control

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    A similar trend of salinity-related reductions was reported for 100-pod weight, 100-kernel weight and shelling percentage.

    Enhancing Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) Productivity and Biochemical Traits: A Comparison of Straw Mulch and Polythene Mulch Under Prolonged Salinity Stress · 2024

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Mulching had no clear effect on yield.

    Intensification of rain-fed groundnut production in North Kordofan State, Sudan · 2018

    Opposite direction

  5. positive
    GMMF increased average pod yield by 27.85 relative to RTNM.

    Effects of Soil Tillage, Management Practices, and Mulching Film Application on Soil Health and Peanut Yield in a Continuous Cropping System · 2020 · compared with RTNM treatment

    Same direction

  6. positive
    White polyethylene mulch outyielded other treatments for groundnut pod yield in both seasons.

    Crop productivity and soil properties as affected by polyethylene film mulch and land configurations in groundnut (Arachis hypogaeaL.) · 2006 · compared with other treatments

    Same direction

  7. positive
    Solar mulching increased total groundnut yield by 52.8%.

    Control of Sclerotium rolfsii and weeds in peanuts by solar heating of the soil · 1979

    Same direction

  8. positive
    Mulching with 2.5 kg hydrogel per ha and integrated nutrient management enhanced oil yield of summer peanut.

    Improvement in Productivity, Water-Use Efficiency, and Soil Nutrient Dynamics of Summer Peanut (Arachis hypogaeaL.) through Use of Polythene Mulch, Hydrogel, and Nutrient Management · 2017

    Same direction

60 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.