Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Fungicide application in dry 1998 had no effect on chickpea blight severity or yield.

A claim from Foliar fungicides to manage ascochyta blight [Ascochyta rabiei] of chickpea in Canada · 2003

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide application in dry 1998 had no effect on chickpea blight severity or yield.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
fungicide applicatione0
Interactor
Ascochyta rabieiAscochyta rabieit0pathogen
Outcome
blight severity and yielde0
Direction
no effecte0
Qualifier
Dry weather in 1998e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ascochyta rabiei
Ascochyta rabiei · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDr. Weidong Chen Research Plant Pathologist · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dry weather in 1998 resulted in low disease pressure, and fungicide application had no effect on blight severity and yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–364
t0

“Ascochyta rabiei] of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–75

Title

Foliar fungicides to manage ascochyta blight [Ascochyta rabiei] of chickpea in Canada

G. Chongo; L. Buchwaldt; B.D. Gossen; et al. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 2003. doi:10.1080/07060660309507061

Other claims from this paper (18)

Record rev-1a65bfd539dfedb21f39550176e4e23055aec1bd8e2d791a05c4aebfccd9b9b9 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

fungicide · Ascochyta rabiei · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. negative
See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.