Intervention effectmodel-written summary

F. graminearum GA18W 3.1.4 produced higher disease severity than pooled F. poae on wheat and barley.

A claim from Assessment of Pathogenicity and Aggressiveness of Fusarium poae on Wheat and Barley · 2026

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F. graminearum GA18W 3.1.4 produced higher disease severity than pooled F. poae on wheat and barley.

Treatment
F. graminearum GA18W 3.1.4e1
Interactor
F. graminearum GA18W 3.1.4Fusarium graminearume1pathogen
Second interactor
F. poaeFusarium poaee1pathogen
Outcome
SEVe1
Direction
highere1
Value
47%–63%e1
Comparator
pooled F. poaee1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium poae
Fusarium poae · Second interactorWilliam M. Brown Jr., Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“F. graminearum GA18W 3.1.4 produced higher SEV (47%–63%) and FDK (54%–76%) and reduced TKW (to 18 g) relative to pooled F. poae (SEV 14%–36%; FDK 32%–56%; TKW up to 24 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1313
e2

“poses a major threat to wheat and barley production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 80–131

Title

Assessment of Pathogenicity and Aggressiveness of Fusarium poae on Wheat and Barley

Shiwarttan K. Gupt; Bikash Ghimire; Alfredo D. Martinez‐Espinoza; et al. Plant Pathology 2026. doi:10.1111/ppa.70161

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-1b4ef520e59aa9df841ffefe3ba0e78c9e275591b9f1f4a617cee0e47ebe8eb5 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

Fusarium graminearum · disease · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. negative
  5. negative
See all 6 papers →

Fusarium graminearum · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 1 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.