Intervention effectmodel-written summary

75 kg nitrogen ha-1 with no sulphur produced significantly lower grain yield of 23.02 q ha-1.

A claim from Productivity and Economics of Irrigated Wheat as Influenced by Nitrogen and Sulphur Levels · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

75 kg nitrogen ha-1 with no sulphur produced significantly lower grain yield of 23.02 q ha-1.

Treatment
nitrogen at 75 kg ha-1 along with 0 kg S ha-1e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
lowere0
Value
23.02 q ha-1e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly lower grain yield (23.02 q ha-1), gross return (Rs. 51039 ha-1), net return (Rs. 14228 ha-1) and sedimentation value (45.48 ml) were observed with application of nitrogen at 75 kg ha-1 along with 0 kg S ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–979
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45

Title

Productivity and Economics of Irrigated Wheat as Influenced by Nitrogen and Sulphur Levels

Zamir Muradi; T. Sudha International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2020. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2020.910.358

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-1bb4df62bc608f0af7b3ddf3d786c641a037d808287c090dbe81fd30589341b4 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

324 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1,736 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

2,052 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.