Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Productivity and Economics of Irrigated Wheat as Influenced by Nitrogen and Sulphur Levels

Zamir Muradi; T. Sudha

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at All India Co-ordinated Wheat and Barley Improvement Project (AICW & BIP), Main Agricultural Research Station, UAS, Dharwad, to study the productivity and economics of irrigated wheat as influenced by nitrogen and sulphur levels. The field experiment was laid out in split-plot design with three replications and twelve treatment combinations involving three main and four subplots. The results indicated that, application of 125 kg N ha-1 along with sulphur 30 kg ha-1 has recorded significantly higher grain yield (42.47q ha-1), gross return (Rs. 92.756 ha-1), net return (Rs. 54064 ha-1) and sedimentation value (47.23 ml) and was on par with application of 100 kg N ha-1 along with sulphur level @ 20 kg ha-1. However, significantly lower grain yield (23.02 q ha-1), gross return (Rs. 51039 ha-1), net return (Rs. 14228 ha-1) and sedimentation value (45.48 ml) were observed with application of nitrogen at 75 kg ha-1 along with 0 kg S ha-1.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

125 kg N ha-1 with 30 kg sulphur ha-1 produced significantly higher grain yield of 42.47q ha-1.

Treatment
125 kg N ha-1 along with sulphur 30 kg ha-1e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
42.47q ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 125 kg N ha-1 along with sulphur 30 kg ha-1 has recorded significantly higher grain yield (42.47q ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–564 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

125 kg N ha-1 with 30 kg sulphur ha-1 produced significantly higher gross return of Rs. 92.756 ha-1.

Treatment
125 kg N ha-1 along with sulphur 30 kg ha-1e0
Outcome
gross returne0
Direction
highere0
Value
Rs. 92.756 ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 125 kg N ha-1 along with sulphur 30 kg ha-1 has recorded significantly higher grain yield (42.47q ha-1), gross return (Rs. 92.756 ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–596 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

125 kg N ha-1 with 30 kg sulphur ha-1 produced significantly higher net return of Rs. 54064 ha-1.

Treatment
125 kg N ha-1 along with sulphur 30 kg ha-1e0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
highere0
Value
Rs. 54064 ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 125 kg N ha-1 along with sulphur 30 kg ha-1 has recorded significantly higher grain yield (42.47q ha-1), gross return (Rs. 92.756 ha-1), net return (Rs. 54064 ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–625 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

125 kg N ha-1 with 30 kg sulphur ha-1 produced significantly higher sedimentation value of 47.23 ml.

Treatment
125 kg N ha-1 along with sulphur 30 kg ha-1e0
Outcome
sedimentation valuee0
Direction
highere0
Value
47.23 mle0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 125 kg N ha-1 along with sulphur 30 kg ha-1 has recorded significantly higher grain yield (42.47q ha-1), gross return (Rs. 92.756 ha-1), net return (Rs. 54064 ha-1) and sedimentation value (47.23 ml)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–660 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 125 kg N and 30 kg sulphur treatment was on par with 100 kg N and 20 kg sulphur.

Outcome
on pare0
Comparator
100 kg N ha-1 along with sulphur level @ 20 kg ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“was on par with application of 100 kg N ha-1 along with sulphur level @ 20 kg ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–747 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

75 kg nitrogen ha-1 with no sulphur produced significantly lower grain yield of 23.02 q ha-1.

Treatment
nitrogen at 75 kg ha-1 along with 0 kg S ha-1e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
lowere0
Value
23.02 q ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly lower grain yield (23.02 q ha-1), gross return (Rs. 51039 ha-1), net return (Rs. 14228 ha-1) and sedimentation value (45.48 ml) were observed with application of nitrogen at 75 kg ha-1 along with 0 kg S ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–979 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

75 kg nitrogen ha-1 with no sulphur produced significantly lower gross return of Rs. 51039 ha-1.

Treatment
nitrogen at 75 kg ha-1 along with 0 kg S ha-1e0
Outcome
gross returne0
Direction
lowere0
Value
Rs. 51039 ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly lower grain yield (23.02 q ha-1), gross return (Rs. 51039 ha-1), net return (Rs. 14228 ha-1) and sedimentation value (45.48 ml) were observed with application of nitrogen at 75 kg ha-1 along with 0 kg S ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–979 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

75 kg nitrogen ha-1 with no sulphur produced significantly lower net return of Rs. 14228 ha-1.

Treatment
nitrogen at 75 kg ha-1 along with 0 kg S ha-1e0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
lowere0
Value
Rs. 14228 ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly lower grain yield (23.02 q ha-1), gross return (Rs. 51039 ha-1), net return (Rs. 14228 ha-1) and sedimentation value (45.48 ml) were observed with application of nitrogen at 75 kg ha-1 along with 0 kg S ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–979 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

75 kg nitrogen ha-1 with no sulphur produced significantly lower sedimentation value of 45.48 ml.

Treatment
nitrogen at 75 kg ha-1 along with 0 kg S ha-1e0
Outcome
sedimentation valuee0
Direction
lowere0
Value
45.48 mle0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly lower grain yield (23.02 q ha-1), gross return (Rs. 51039 ha-1), net return (Rs. 14228 ha-1) and sedimentation value (45.48 ml) were observed with application of nitrogen at 75 kg ha-1 along with 0 kg S ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–979 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

148 papers: 124 positive, 24 negative or no effect

123 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

144 papers more in this group

See all 148 papers →

sulfur atom · soil: physics · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

nitrogen · soil: physics · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 31 positive, 10 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.