Abstract
Two wheat fertilization experiments were conducted during the 2005-2006 and 2007-2008 seasons using a medial, mesic, seric, Typic Placandept soil to determine the effect of sulfur on the yield, percentage of protein, gluten content, and sedimentation volume of the grain and the nutrient availability in the soil. During the 2005-06 season, the fertilization treatments consisted of a base fertilization plus various sulfur treatments: 0 kg S ha-1 (T1); 27 kg S ha-1 (T2); 54 kg S ha-1 (T3) or 108 kg S ha-1 (T4). During the 2007-08 season, the fertilization treatments were 0 kg S ha-1 (T1), 9 kg S ha-1 (T2), 18 kg S ha-1 and 36 kg S ha-1 (T4). The results showed no differences (P<0.05) in the grain yield for any of the treatments evaluated. Furthermore, no increases were found for any of the industrial quality variables analyzed. In contrast, increases in the availability of sulfur in the soil were observed. Sulfur application in soils having contents of 12 and 13 mg kg-1 S did not increase the grain yield, protein content, gluten, or sedimentation volume.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Sulfur treatments gave no differences in wheat grain yield.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- various sulfur treatmentse2
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- no differencese0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effects of sulfur fertilization on wheat production and industrial quality (Triticum aestivum)”
e0“The results showed no differences (P<0.05) in the grain yield for any of the treatments evaluated”
e2“the fertilization treatments consisted of a base fertilization plus various sulfur treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Sulfur treatments did not increase industrial quality variables of wheat grain.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- various sulfur treatmentse2
- Outcome
- industrial quality variablese1
- Direction
- no increasese1
- Qualifier
- percentage of protein, gluten content, and sedimentation volumee3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effects of sulfur fertilization on wheat production and industrial quality (Triticum aestivum)”
e1“no increases were found for any of the industrial quality variables analyzed”
e2“the fertilization treatments consisted of a base fertilization plus various sulfur treatments”
e3“percentage of protein, gluten content, and sedimentation volume of the grain”
Claim · model-written summary
Sulfur application increased sulfur availability in the soil under wheat.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- sulfure4
- Outcome
- availability of sulfur in the soile4
- Direction
- increasese4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effects of sulfur fertilization on wheat production and industrial quality (Triticum aestivum)”
e4“increases in the availability of sulfur in the soil were observed”
Claim · model-written summary
Sulfur application in soils with 12 and 13 mg kg-1 S did not increase wheat grain yield or protein and gluten content.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Sulfur applicatione5
- Outcome
- grain yield, protein content, glutene5
- Direction
- did not increasee5
- Qualifier
- soils having contents of 12 and 13 mg kg-1 Se5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effects of sulfur fertilization on wheat production and industrial quality (Triticum aestivum)”
e5“Sulfur application in soils having contents of 12 and 13 mg kg-1 S did not increase the grain yield, protein content, gluten, or sedimentation volume”
Claim · model-written summary
Sulfur application in soils with 12 and 13 mg kg-1 S did not increase wheat sedimentation volume.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Sulfur applicatione5
- Outcome
- sedimentation volumee5
- Direction
- did not increasee5
- Qualifier
- soils having contents of 12 and 13 mg kg-1 Se5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effects of sulfur fertilization on wheat production and industrial quality (Triticum aestivum)”
e5“Sulfur application in soils having contents of 12 and 13 mg kg-1 S did not increase the grain yield, protein content, gluten, or sedimentation volume”
The same questions in other papers
sulfur atom · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →sulfur atom · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
47 papers more in this group
See all 51 papers →sulfur atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 124 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
144 papers more in this group
See all 148 papers →sulfur atom · soil: physics · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.