Paper · 2018 · Journal of Chemistry

Sulphur and Nitrogen Fertilization as a Potential Means of Agronomic Biofortification to Improve the Content and Uptake of Microelements in Spring Wheat Grain DM

Hanna Klikocka; Marek Marks

15
claims
29
verbatim quotes
55
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The aim of the field experiment was to analyze the impact of various nitrogen and sulphur doses on the content and uptake of spring grains of iron, manganese, copper, and zinc. The study was conducted in southeastern Poland (2009–2011) on Cambisols (WRB 2007), in conditions of low soil sulphur content. The experiment included 4 doses of N fertilization (0, 40, 80, and 120 kg/ha) and 2 doses of S application (0 and 50 kg/ha). The analysis showed that fertilization with nitrogen and sulphur had a positive effect on the studied features of spring wheat. The combination resulted in beneficial content of Fe, Mn, Zn, and Cu (Fe 45.00, Mn 35.67, Zn 34.63, and Cu 3.65 mg/kg) and beneficial uptake of microelements by grain DM (Fe 216.1, Mn 171.3, Zn 166.4, and Cu 17.52 g/ha). The highest grain yield (5.43 t/ha) was obtained after the application of nitrogen at a dose of 80 kg/ha and sulphur at a dose of 50 kg/ha. In relation to control, this increase of grain yield amounted to 13.3%. Significant correlations were also found between grain yield and the content and uptake of all microelements, as well as between elements. No significant correlation was found only between the content and uptake of Fe and the content of Mn and between the content of Mn and Cu. Sulphur supplementation of NPK fertilization can be a good means of agronomic biofortification for spring wheat in order to increase the content and uptake of micronutrients such as Fe, Mn, Zn, and Cu.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen and sulphur fertilization had a positive effect on the studied features of spring wheat

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
fertilization with nitrogen and sulphure0
Outcome
studied featurese0
Direction
positive effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fertilization with nitrogen and sulphur had a positive effect on the studied features of spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–555 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of nitrogen and sulphur gave beneficial Fe content of 45.00 in spring wheat grain

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
fertilization with nitrogen and sulphure0
Outcome
contente1
Value
45.00e1
Qualifier
Fe 45.00e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fertilization with nitrogen and sulphur had a positive effect on the studied features of spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–555 · show in text ↑
e1

“The combination resulted in beneficial content of Fe, Mn, Zn, and Cu (Fe 45.00, Mn 35.67, Zn 34.63, and Cu 3.65 mg/kg)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–675 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of nitrogen and sulphur gave beneficial Mn content of 35.67 in spring wheat grain

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
fertilization with nitrogen and sulphure0
Outcome
contente1
Value
35.67e1
Qualifier
Mn 35.67e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fertilization with nitrogen and sulphur had a positive effect on the studied features of spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–555 · show in text ↑
e1

“The combination resulted in beneficial content of Fe, Mn, Zn, and Cu (Fe 45.00, Mn 35.67, Zn 34.63, and Cu 3.65 mg/kg)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–675 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of nitrogen and sulphur gave beneficial Zn content of 34.63 in spring wheat grain

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
fertilization with nitrogen and sulphure0
Outcome
contente1
Value
34.63e1
Qualifier
Zn 34.63e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fertilization with nitrogen and sulphur had a positive effect on the studied features of spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–555 · show in text ↑
e1

“The combination resulted in beneficial content of Fe, Mn, Zn, and Cu (Fe 45.00, Mn 35.67, Zn 34.63, and Cu 3.65 mg/kg)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–675 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of nitrogen and sulphur gave beneficial Cu content of 3.65 in spring wheat grain

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
fertilization with nitrogen and sulphure0
Outcome
contente1
Value
3.65e1
Qualifier
Cu 3.65e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fertilization with nitrogen and sulphur had a positive effect on the studied features of spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–555 · show in text ↑
e1

“The combination resulted in beneficial content of Fe, Mn, Zn, and Cu (Fe 45.00, Mn 35.67, Zn 34.63, and Cu 3.65 mg/kg)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–675 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of nitrogen and sulphur gave beneficial uptake of Fe of 216.1 by spring wheat grain

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
fertilization with nitrogen and sulphure0
Outcome
uptake of microelements by grain DMe2
Value
216.1e2
Qualifier
Fe 216.1e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fertilization with nitrogen and sulphur had a positive effect on the studied features of spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–555 · show in text ↑
e2

“beneficial uptake of microelements by grain DM (Fe 216.1, Mn 171.3, Zn 166.4, and Cu 17.52 g/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–776 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of nitrogen and sulphur gave beneficial uptake of Mn of 171.3 by spring wheat grain

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
fertilization with nitrogen and sulphure0
Outcome
uptake of microelements by grain DMe2
Value
171.3e2
Qualifier
Mn 171.3e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fertilization with nitrogen and sulphur had a positive effect on the studied features of spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–555 · show in text ↑
e2

“beneficial uptake of microelements by grain DM (Fe 216.1, Mn 171.3, Zn 166.4, and Cu 17.52 g/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–776 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of nitrogen and sulphur gave beneficial uptake of Zn of 166.4 by spring wheat grain

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
fertilization with nitrogen and sulphure0
Outcome
uptake of microelements by grain DMe2
Value
166.4e2
Qualifier
Zn 166.4e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fertilization with nitrogen and sulphur had a positive effect on the studied features of spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–555 · show in text ↑
e2

“beneficial uptake of microelements by grain DM (Fe 216.1, Mn 171.3, Zn 166.4, and Cu 17.52 g/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–776 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of nitrogen and sulphur gave beneficial uptake of Cu of 17.52 by spring wheat grain

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
fertilization with nitrogen and sulphure0
Outcome
uptake of microelements by grain DMe2
Value
17.52e2
Qualifier
Cu 17.52e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fertilization with nitrogen and sulphur had a positive effect on the studied features of spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–555 · show in text ↑
e2

“beneficial uptake of microelements by grain DM (Fe 216.1, Mn 171.3, Zn 166.4, and Cu 17.52 g/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–776 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest spring wheat grain yield (5.43 t/ha) was obtained with nitrogen at 80 kg/ha and sulphur at 50 kg/ha

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
nitrogen at a dose of 80 kg/ha and sulphur at a dose of 50 kg/hae3
Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
higheste3
Value
5.43 t/hae3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fertilization with nitrogen and sulphur had a positive effect on the studied features of spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–555 · show in text ↑
e3

“The highest grain yield (5.43 t/ha) was obtained after the application of nitrogen at a dose of 80 kg/ha and sulphur at a dose of 50 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–916 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen 80 kg/ha and sulphur 50 kg/ha increased spring wheat grain yield by 13.3% relative to control

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
nitrogen at a dose of 80 kg/ha and sulphur at a dose of 50 kg/hae3
Outcome
grain yielde4
Direction
increasee4
Value
13.3%e4
Comparator
controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fertilization with nitrogen and sulphur had a positive effect on the studied features of spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–555 · show in text ↑
e3

“The highest grain yield (5.43 t/ha) was obtained after the application of nitrogen at a dose of 80 kg/ha and sulphur at a dose of 50 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–916 · show in text ↑
e4

“In relation to control, this increase of grain yield amounted to 13.3%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–988 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield was significantly correlated with the content and uptake of microelements

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Compound
microelementse5
Outcome
grain yielde5

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fertilization with nitrogen and sulphur had a positive effect on the studied features of spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–555 · show in text ↑
e5

“Significant correlations were also found between grain yield and the content and uptake of all microelements”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1098 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fe content and uptake showed no significant correlation with Mn content

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Compound
Fee6
Outcome
correlatione6
Direction
no_changeinferrede6
Qualifier
content of Mne6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fertilization with nitrogen and sulphur had a positive effect on the studied features of spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–555 · show in text ↑
e6

“No significant correlation was found only between the content and uptake of Fe and the content of Mn and between the content of Mn and Cu”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1266 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mn content showed no significant correlation with Cu content

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Compound
Mne6
Outcome
correlatione6
Direction
no_changeinferrede6
Qualifier
Cue6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fertilization with nitrogen and sulphur had a positive effect on the studied features of spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–555 · show in text ↑
e6

“No significant correlation was found only between the content and uptake of Fe and the content of Mn and between the content of Mn and Cu”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1266 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur supplementation of NPK fertilization is suggested as a means of agronomic biofortification of spring wheat

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume7
Treatment
Sulphur supplementation of NPK fertilizatione7
Outcome
content and uptake of micronutrientse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Sulphur supplementation of NPK fertilization can be a good means of agronomic biofortification for spring wheat in order to increase the content and uptake of micronutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1268–1441 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

148 papers: 124 positive, 24 negative or no effect

123 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

144 papers more in this group

See all 148 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. negative

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.