Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Giant foxtail reduced soybean yield 13% in 1969.

A claim from Effect of Weeds on Soybean Yield and Harvesting Efficiency · 1971

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Giant foxtail reduced soybean yield 13% in 1969.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
giant foxtail ( Setaria faberii Herrm.) infestation of one plant per ft in 30-inch rowse0
Interactor
giant foxtaile0weed
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
13%e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A giant foxtail ( Setaria faberii Herrm.) infestation of one plant per ft in 30-inch rows reduced yield 13% in 1969”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 166–281
e1

“soybean ( Glycine max (L.) Merr.) yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 15–54

Title

Effect of Weeds on Soybean Yield and Harvesting Efficiency

W. R. Nave; L. M. Wax Weed Science 1971. doi:10.1017/s0043174500050608

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-1bd2ce044b0882ba038c8c36be8f04544b6f4edf5d76cc2f4f9990efa6e31fb9 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

Alopecurus pratensis · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. negative
See all 5 papers →

infection · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

51 papers: 9 positive, 42 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

42 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.