Intervention effectmodel-written summary

More irrigation increased spike length.

A claim from Behaviour of different wheat genotypes under various irrigation conditions under eastern region of Jharkhand · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

More irrigation increased spike length.

Treatment
Increase in irrigation levele0
Outcome
spike lengthe0
Direction
highere0
Value
12.7 cme0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increase in irrigation level resulted in significantly more effective tillers (336/m2), higher spike length (12.7 cm), fertile spikelets/ spike (46.27), number of grains/spike (41.42), 1000-grain weight (41.31g), resulting in 20.89 % higher grain yield (37.97q/ha) and straw yield (55.04 q/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–1071
t0

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–38

Title

Behaviour of different wheat genotypes under various irrigation conditions under eastern region of Jharkhand

Md. Parwaiz Alam; SK Singh; Kuldeep Kumar Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2019

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-1c47f651b5d80a6a1d1cc81a05ab91d60ac76d0b67080c8c200418188132289a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this claim · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.