Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Irrigation at 1.0 IW/CPE gave 39.96% harvest index.

A claim from Effect of Irrigation Scheduling and Different Sowing Dates on Growth and Yield of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 1.0 IW/CPE gave 39.96% harvest index.

Treatment
1.0 IW/CPE ratio irrigatione0
Outcome
Yieldt0
Value
39.96%e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1.0 IW/CPE ratio irrigation (39.96%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1109
t0

“Yield of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–87

Title

Effect of Irrigation Scheduling and Different Sowing Dates on Growth and Yield of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Pravesh Kumar; Vineet Dheer; Pradeep Kumar; et al. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change 2024. doi:10.9734/ijecc/2024/v14i13820

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-1e0e68222ffadb14e4f71e4f11d20ee55766ccc3e57698815730ea4a16000277 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this claim · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    The I7 irrigation schedule gave the maximum effective tillers at harvest, 94.66.

    Effect of irrigation scheduling on the growth and yield of wheat genotypes · 2015

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. positive
    Irrigation at 1.0 IW/CPE increased wheat shoots, height and dry matter.

    Effect of Irrigation Scheduling and Different Sowing Dates on Water Productivity and Economics of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) · 2023

    Same directionCited by this paper

  3. negative
    Minimum irrigation lowered average winter wheat yield by 14% versus full irrigation.

    Performance of Double‐Cropped Winter Wheat–Summer Maize under Minimum Irrigation in the North China Plain · 2006 · compared with fully irrigated treatment (FI)

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Moderately saline water substituted for good quality water during part of the season maintained total wheat grain yield.

    Time of Salt Stress Affects Growth and Yield Components of Irrigated Wheat · 1994 · compared with good quality water

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Saline irrigation caused soil salinization and reduced wheat growth and yield.

    Effect of Straw Biochar on Soil Properties and Wheat Production under Saline Water Irrigation · 2019

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Deficit irrigation in salt-affected soil reduced wheat productivity.

    Collaborative Impact of Compost and Beneficial Rhizobacteria on Soil Properties, Physiological Attributes, and Productivity of Wheat Subjected to Deficit Irrigation in Salt Affected Soil · 2022

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Wastewater irrigation decreased plant height, leaf area and grain yield in wheat.

    Effect of Wastewater Irrigation on Photosynthesis, Growth, and Anatomical Features of Two Wheat Cultivars (Triticum aestivum L.) · 2020

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    An additional 33 mm of irrigation did not increase grain yield.

    Source–sink balance and manipulating sink–source relations of wheat indicate that the yield potential of wheat is sink-limited in high-rainfall zones · 2010

    Opposite direction

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.