Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Ammonium sulphate with or without N-Serve did not differ significantly from sulphur-coated urea in tillering, leaf N concentration and cane yield.

A claim from Comparison of sulphur-coated urea and ammonium sulphate amended with N-Serve as sources of nitrogen for sugarcane · 1975

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium sulphate with or without N-Serve did not differ significantly from sulphur-coated urea in tillering, leaf N concentration and cane yield.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
ammonium sulphate (AS) with and without N-Servee1
Outcome
tillering, the leaf N concentration and cane yielde0
Direction
no significant differencese0
Comparator
sulphurcoated urea (SCU)e1
Setting
pot experimente0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“studied in a pot experiment, showed that although the tillering, the leaf N concentration and cane yield were increased by adding fertilizer N there were no significant differences between N sources”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–327
e1

“A comparison of ammonium sulphate (AS) with and without N-Serve and sulphurcoated urea (SCU) as N sources for sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–127

Title

Comparison of sulphur-coated urea and ammonium sulphate amended with N-Serve as sources of nitrogen for sugarcane

R. C. Dalal; M. Prasad The Journal of Agricultural Science 1975. doi:10.1017/s0021859600062304

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-1f49cbbbb387ca9f3c07b5376715fb284a5ac9287bb6d886e7d9f588a9d3c506 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

ammonium sulfate · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
    The integrated treatment increased cane yield by 91% over the farmers method.

    Studies on integration of tillage and herbicides for weed control in sugarcane · 2002 · compared with farmers method of three disc harrowings and hand weeding twice at 30 and 60 DAP

    No difference from an alternative

See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.