Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Expression of canonical α-SNAPs counteracted cytotoxicity caused by resistance-type α-SNAPs.

A claim from Disease resistance through impairment of α-SNAP–NSF interaction and vesicular trafficking by soybean Rhg1 · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Expression of canonical α-SNAPs counteracted cytotoxicity caused by resistance-type α-SNAPs.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
Expression of these α-SNAPse0
Gene
α-SNAPse0
Outcome
cytotoxicitye0
Direction
counteractede0

Not reportedMaterialCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Expression of these α-SNAPs counteracted the cytotoxicity of resistance-type Rhg1 α-SNAPs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1287
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–100

Title

Disease resistance through impairment of α-SNAP–NSF interaction and vesicular trafficking by soybean Rhg1

Adam M. Bayless; John M. Smith; Junqi Song; et al. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2016. doi:10.1073/pnas.1610150113

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-1f514b54cc05be99ab0ce8be2848871d8daed5a07f3ce95dba917dc4442235e8 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

transgenic · cytology · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.