Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Nicosulfuron decreased maize grain yield in 2015 compared with control.

A claim from Reaction of susceptible maize inbred lines to herbicides · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nicosulfuron decreased maize grain yield in 2015 compared with control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
nicosulfurone0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
decreasinge0
Comparator
controle0
Setting
2015e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in 2015 nicosulfuron expressed the lowest selectivity, by decreasing grain yield and soluble proteins up to the 21th day after herbicide application, when compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1387–1562
t0

“Reaction of susceptible maize inbred lines to herbicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–56

Title

Reaction of susceptible maize inbred lines to herbicides

Vesna Dragicevic; Milena Simic; Katarina Jovanovic-Radovanov; et al. Genetika 2017. doi:10.2298/gensr1703765d

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-1f58fb5319abbcdc9213db5d65da0e249c4dc6fda22b57a34cb93224b9e95268 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

nicosulfuron · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

59 papers: 40 positive, 19 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this claim · 40 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Nicosulfuron treatments more than doubled corn yields at dryland sites in both years.

    Rhizome Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) Control in Corn (Zea mays) with Primisulfuron and Nicosulfuron · 1991

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
    Corn grain yield was greater when giant foxtail was controlled POST with nicosulfuron than with PRE soil-applied herbicides.

    Postemergence herbicide application timing effects on annual grass control and corn (Zea mays) grain yield · 1997 · compared with PRE control with selected soil-applied herbicides

    Opposite direction

  3. positive
    Landmark sweet corn was among the most tolerant to nicosulfuron and primisulfuron, with yield similar to the control.

    Response of Sweet Corn (Zea mays) to Nicosulfuron and Primisulfuron · 1992 · compared with the control

    Opposite direction

  4. positive
    Corn yields under total POST mesotrione combinations were comparable to PRE programs.

    Comparison of Mesotrione Combinations with Standard Weed Control Programs in Corn · 2006 · compared with S -metolachlor plus atrazine PRE alone or fb nicosulfuron plus rimsulfuron plus atrazine POST

    Opposite direction

  5. positive
    Following EPTC and cyanazine in 1991, nicosulfuron on 25 cm millet caused no later loss of sweet corn yield.

    Effect of Nicosulfuron Timing on Wild-Proso Millet (Panicum miliaceum) Control in Sweet Corn (Zea mays)1 · 2000

    Opposite direction

  6. positive
    Hand weeding and hoeing followed by Nicosulfuron significantly increased the yield and yield components of maize.

    Management of Weeds in Maize (Zea mays L.) through Various Pre and Post Emergency Herbicides · 2014

    Opposite direction

  7. positive
    The Formula TL hybrid had the highest mass of a thousand grains and yield with nicosulfuron + tembotrione.

    Chemical management of weeds in corn hybrids · 2018

    Opposite direction

  8. positive
    Wild-proso millet control with nicosulfuron at 0.027 kg/ha gave higher corn grain yield than all PRE treatments except SAN 582H.

    Sequential Applications Control Woolly Cupgrass (Eriochloa villosa) and Wild-Proso Millet (Panicum miliaceum) in Corn (Zea mays) · 1997 · compared with all PRE treatments except for SAN 582H

    Opposite direction

50 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.