Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Wild-proso millet control with nicosulfuron at 0.027 kg/ha gave higher corn grain yield than all PRE treatments except SAN 582H.

A claim from Sequential Applications Control Woolly Cupgrass (Eriochloa villosa) and Wild-Proso Millet (Panicum miliaceum) in Corn (Zea mays) · 1997

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wild-proso millet control with nicosulfuron at 0.027 kg/ha gave higher corn grain yield than all PRE treatments except SAN 582H.

Treatment
nicosulfuron at 0.027 kg/hae0
Interactor
Wild-proso millete0weed
Outcome
corn grain yielde0
Direction
greater thane0
Comparator
all PRE treatments except for SAN 582He0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wild-proso millet control with nicosulfuron at 0.027 kg/ha resulted in corn grain yield that was less than with sequential treatments, but greater than with all PRE treatments except for SAN 582H”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–882
t0

“in Corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–128

Title

Sequential Applications Control Woolly Cupgrass (Eriochloa villosa) and Wild-Proso Millet (Panicum miliaceum) in Corn (Zea mays)

Thomas L. Rabaey; R. Gordon Harvey Weed Technology 1997. doi:10.1017/s0890037x00045383

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-e78cdf4b086646fce6448fdc2893879681e1632d501bea96b96dbf7a0bdd06c1 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

nicosulfuron · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

59 papers: 40 positive, 19 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this claim · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

50 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.