Paper · 2000 · Weed Technology

Woolly Cupgrass (Eriochloa villosa) Management in Corn (Zea mays) by Sequential Herbicide Applications and Cultivation1

JAMES A. MICKELSON; R. GORDON HARVEY

11
claims
23
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted in southern Wisconsin from 1996 to 1998 to evaluate the effects of acetochlor applied preemergence (PRE) followed by nicosulfuron or sethoxydim applied postemergence (POST) and of cultivation on woolly cupgrass control, corn grain yield, and woolly cupgrass seed production. Sethoxydim treatments provided greater woolly cupgrass control than nicosulfuron treatments in 1997 and similar control to nicosulfuron treatments in 1996 and 1998. However, neither herbicide killed all emerged woolly cupgrass plants, regardless of herbicide rate or POST application timing. Late postemergence treatments provided greater season-long control than early postemergence treatments in 1996 and 1998, but there was no difference in control between timings in 1997. Acetochlor applied PRE at 1,800 g ai/ha (1×) followed by nicosulfuron (35 g ai/ha) or sethoxydim (213 g ai/ha) at the registered rate (1×) or at one half of the registered rate (0.5×) consistently provided sufficient woolly cupgrass control to maximize corn yield, regardless of cultivation or POST herbicide application timing. Acetochlor PRE treatments, cultivated and noncultivated, followed by sethoxydim POST and cultivated acetochlor PRE treatments followed by nicosulfuron POST treatments provided sufficient control in each year to limit woolly cupgrass seed production to a level that decreased the predicted future seedbank density, regardless of herbicide rate or POST herbicide application timing. However, noncultivated acetochlor treatments followed by nicosulfuron applied at 1× followed by 0.5× or at 0.5× followed by 0.5× did not consistently reduce seed production to a level that decreased the predicted future seedbank density. These results suggest that the rate of sethoxydim can be reduced to 0.5× if a full rate of acetochlor is applied PRE with little effect on corn yield or woolly cupgrass seedbank density. However, reducing the rate of nicosulfuron to 0.5× following an application of acetochlor at the full rate or reducing both the acetochlor and nicosulfuron or sethoxydim rate to 0.5× is recommended only if a cultivation is planned.Nomenclature: Acetochlor; nicosulfuron; sethoxydim; woolly cupgrass, Eriochloa villosa (Thunb.) Kunth #3 ERBVI; corn, Zea mays L. ‘DeKalb SR404’, ‘DeKalb DK493SR’.Additional index words: Acetochlor, herbicide rate, herbicide application timing, nicosulfuron, sethoxydim, sethoxydim-resistant corn, woolly cupgrass seed production.Abbreviations: COC, crop oil concentrate; DAT, days after treatment; EPOST, early postemergence; LPOST, late postemergence; OM, organic matter; POST, postemergence; PRE, preemergence; UAN, urea ammonium nitrate.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sethoxydim gave greater woolly cupgrass control than nicosulfuron in 1997.

Treatment
Sethoxydim treatmentse0
Interactor
woolly cupgrasse0weed
Outcome
woolly cupgrass controle0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
nicosulfuron treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sethoxydim treatments provided greater woolly cupgrass control than nicosulfuron treatments in 1997”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 308–407 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sethoxydim and nicosulfuron gave similar control in 1996 and 1998.

Treatment
Sethoxydim treatmentse1
Interactor
woolly cupgrasse2weed
Outcome
controle0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
nicosulfuron treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“similar control to nicosulfuron treatments in 1996 and 1998”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–471 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–54 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sethoxydim treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 308–329 · show in text ↑
e2

“greater woolly cupgrass control than nicosulfuron treatments in 1997”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 339–407 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neither herbicide killed all emerged woolly cupgrass.

Taxon
woolly cupgrasse0
Outcome
killed all emerged woolly cupgrass plantse0
Direction
neithere0
Qualifier
regardless of herbicide rate or POST application timinge0

Verbatim

e0

“neither herbicide killed all emerged woolly cupgrass plants, regardless of herbicide rate or POST application timing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–598 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late postemergence treatment improved season-long weed control in 1996 and 1998.

Treatment
Late postemergence treatmentse0
Interactor
woolly cupgrasse1weed
Outcome
season-long controle0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
early postemergence treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Late postemergence treatments provided greater season-long control than early postemergence treatments in 1996 and 1998”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–719 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–54 · show in text ↑
e1

“woolly cupgrass control, corn grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 228–269 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application timing did not change control in 1997.

Treatment
timingse0
Outcome
controle0
Direction
no differencee0
Comparator
between timingse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no difference in control between timings in 1997”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–783 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acetochlor then nicosulfuron sufficiently controlled cupgrass to maximize corn yield.

Treatment
Acetochlor applied PRE at 1,800 g ai/ha (1×) followed by nicosulfuron (35 g ai/ha)e0
Interactor
woolly cupgrasse0weed
Outcome
corn yielde0
Direction
maximizee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Acetochlor applied PRE at 1,800 g ai/ha (1×) followed by nicosulfuron (35 g ai/ha) or sethoxydim (213 g ai/ha) at the registered rate (1×) or at one half of the registered rate (0.5×) consistently provided sufficient woolly cupgrass control to maximize corn yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–1048 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The acetochlor sequences gave sufficient woolly cupgrass control.

Treatment
Acetochlor applied PRE at 1,800 g ai/ha (1×) followed by nicosulfuron (35 g ai/ha) or sethoxydim (213 g ai/ha)e0
Interactor
woolly cupgrasse0weed
Outcome
woolly cupgrass controle0
Direction
sufficiente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Acetochlor applied PRE at 1,800 g ai/ha (1×) followed by nicosulfuron (35 g ai/ha) or sethoxydim (213 g ai/ha) at the registered rate (1×) or at one half of the registered rate (0.5×) consistently provided sufficient woolly cupgrass control to maximize corn yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–1048 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acetochlor then sethoxydim suppressed weed seed production enough to reduce predicted seedbank density.

Treatment
Acetochlor PRE treatments, cultivated and noncultivated, followed by sethoxydim POSTe0
Interactor
woolly cupgrasse1weed
Outcome
woolly cupgrass seed productione1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Acetochlor PRE treatments, cultivated and noncultivated, followed by sethoxydim POST”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1198 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–54 · show in text ↑
e1

“limit woolly cupgrass seed production to a level that decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1325–1388 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Noncultivated acetochlor then nicosulfuron did not consistently suppress seed production sufficiently.

Treatment
noncultivated acetochlor treatments followed by nicosulfurone0
Interactor
woolly cupgrasse1weed
Outcome
seed productione0
Direction
did not consistently reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“noncultivated acetochlor treatments followed by nicosulfuron applied at 1× followed by 0.5× or at 0.5× followed by 0.5× did not consistently reduce seed production to a level that decreased the predicted future seedbank density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1504–1731 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–54 · show in text ↑
e1

“woolly cupgrass seedbank density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1886–1918 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors suggest half-rate sethoxydim following full-rate acetochlor.

Outcome
rate of sethoxydim can be reduced to 0.5×e0
Qualifier
if a full rate of acetochlor is applied PREe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rate of sethoxydim can be reduced to 0.5× if a full rate of acetochlor is applied PRE with little effect on corn yield or woolly cupgrass seedbank density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1764–1918 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend reduced nicosulfuron rates only when cultivation is planned.

Outcome
reducing the rate of nicosulfuron to 0.5×e0
Qualifier
only if a cultivation is plannede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reducing the rate of nicosulfuron to 0.5× following an application of acetochlor at the full rate or reducing both the acetochlor and nicosulfuron or sethoxydim rate to 0.5× is recommended only if a cultivation is planned”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1929–2150 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–54 · show in text ↑

nicosulfuron · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

59 papers: 40 positive, 19 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

55 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

Sethoxydim · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Sethoxydim · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 4 positive, 7 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

acetochlor · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 13 positive, 3 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

nicosulfuron · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 26 positive, 4 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

acetochlor · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

herbicide · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

119 papers: 94 positive, 25 negative or no effect

93 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

115 papers more in this group

See all 119 papers →

herbicide · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

651 papers: 500 positive, 151 negative or no effect

499 papers in the same direction as this paper · 127 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

647 papers more in this group

See all 651 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.