Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Dimethenamid plus cyanazine preemergence followed by nicosulfuron postemergence gave greater than 88% woolly cupgrass control in corn

A claim from Herbicide Timing and Combination Strategies for Woolly Cupgrass Control in Corn · 1996

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dimethenamid plus cyanazine preemergence followed by nicosulfuron postemergence gave greater than 88% woolly cupgrass control in corn

Taxon
field corne0
Treatment
Dimethenamid plus cyanazine applied preemergence and followed by nicosulfuron postemergencee1
Interactor
woolly cupgrasse1weed
Outcome
woolly cupgrass controle1
Direction
greater thane1
Value
88%e1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“field corn ( Zea mays L.) hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 128–161
e1

“Dimethenamid plus cyanazine applied preemergence and followed by nicosulfuron postemergence provided greater than 88% woolly cupgrass control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–637

Title

Herbicide Timing and Combination Strategies for Woolly Cupgrass Control in Corn

Thomas L. Rabaey; R. Gordon Harvey; John W. Albright jpa 1996. doi:10.2134/jpa1996.0381

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-8d792fb19221c032561d16725ac8c45a09ce78deaedc4f26371cd8161114893d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

dimethenamid · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

cyanazine · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive
See all 9 papers →

nicosulfuron · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 26 positive, 4 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.