Paper · 2018 · Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports

Dicamba-Tolerant Volunteer Soybean, Palmer Amaranth, and Green Foxtail Control in Irrigated Field Corn

R. S. Currie; P. W. Geier

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Dicamba-tolerant soybean control was best when Armezon (topramezone) or Armezon Pro (topramezone + dimethenamid) was applied POST with atrazine and glyphosate, and when Status (dicamba + diflufenzopyr), atrazine, and glyphosate were applied POST. These treatments, along with PRE treatments of Armezon Pro and atrazine, completely controlled soybean. Similarly, control of Palmer amaranth and green foxtail was generally best with Armezon Pro and atrazine applied PRE or any herbicide combination applied POST. Corn receiving PRE treatments yielded 41 to 120 bu/a more grain than the weedy checks, whereas corn treated POST yielded 117 to 145 bu/a more grain than the untreated corn.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

POST Armezon or Armezon Pro with atrazine and glyphosate gave the best dicamba-tolerant soybean control.

Treatment
Armezon (topramezone) or Armezon Pro (topramezone + dimethenamid) was applied POST with atrazine and glyphosatee0
Interactor
Dicamba-tolerant soybeane0weed
Outcome
Dicamba-tolerant soybean controle0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Irrigated Field Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“Dicamba-tolerant soybean control was best when Armezon (topramezone) or Armezon Pro (topramezone + dimethenamid) was applied POST with atrazine and glyphosate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–158 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

POST Status with atrazine and glyphosate gave the best dicamba-tolerant soybean control.

Treatment
Status (dicamba + diflufenzopyr), atrazine, and glyphosate were applied POSTe0
Interactor
Dicamba-tolerant soybeane0weed
Outcome
Dicamba-tolerant soybean controle0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Irrigated Field Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“Dicamba-tolerant soybean control was best when Armezon (topramezone) or Armezon Pro (topramezone + dimethenamid) was applied POST with atrazine and glyphosate, and when Status (dicamba + diflufenzopyr), atrazine, and glyphosate were applied POST.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–246 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The stated POST treatments and PRE Armezon Pro with atrazine completely controlled volunteer soybean.

Treatment
PRE treatments of Armezon Pro and atrazinee0
Interactor
soybeanGlycine maxe0weed
Outcome
controlled soybeane0
Direction
completelye0
Qualifier
These treatmentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Glycine max
Glycine max · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Irrigated Field Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“These treatments, along with PRE treatments of Armezon Pro and atrazine, completely controlled soybean.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–350 · show in text ↑
e1

“Dicamba-tolerant soybean control was best when Armezon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PRE Armezon Pro with atrazine or any POST herbicide combination generally gave the best Palmer amaranth and green foxtail control.

Treatment
Armezon Pro and atrazine applied PRE or any herbicide combination applied POSTe0
Interactor
Palmer amaranthe0weed
Second interactor
green foxtaile0weed
Outcome
control of Palmer amaranth and green foxtaile0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Irrigated Field Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“control of Palmer amaranth and green foxtail was generally best with Armezon Pro and atrazine applied PRE or any herbicide combination applied POST.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–510 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn receiving PRE treatments yielded 41 to 120 bu/a more grain than weedy checks.

Treatment
PRE treatmentse0
Outcome
graine0
Direction
moree0
Value
41 to 120 bu/ae0
Comparator
weedy checkse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn receiving PRE treatments yielded 41 to 120 bu/a more grain than the weedy checks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–596 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn treated POST yielded 117 to 145 bu/a more grain than untreated corn.

Treatment
treated POSTe0
Outcome
graine0
Direction
moree0
Value
117 to 145 bu/ae0
Comparator
untreated corne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“corn treated POST yielded 117 to 145 bu/a more grain than the untreated corn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–683 · show in text ↑

dimethenamid · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

topramezone · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

dicamba · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 31 positive, 6 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

glyphosate · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 36 positive, 5 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

atrazine · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

86 papers: 69 positive, 17 negative or no effect

68 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

82 papers more in this group

See all 86 papers →

herbicide · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

119 papers: 94 positive, 25 negative or no effect

93 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

115 papers more in this group

See all 119 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.