Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Acetochlor applied 60 or 45 days before planting gave less foxtail control than metolachlor or flufenacet plus metribuzin.

A claim from Early Preplant Application Timing Effects on Acetamide Efficacy in No-Till Corn (Zea mays)1 · 2003

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acetochlor applied 60 or 45 days before planting gave less foxtail control than metolachlor or flufenacet plus metribuzin.

Taxon
Corn (Zea mays)Zea mayst0
Treatment
acetochlore0
Interactor
giant foxtaile0weed
Outcome
giant foxtail controle0
Direction
lesse0
Qualifier
60 and 45 DBPe0
Comparator
metolachlor and flufenacet plus metribuzine0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dimethenamid and acetochlor applied at 60 and 45 DBP provided less giant foxtail control when compared with metolachlor and flufenacet plus metribuzin applied at the same time.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1209
t0

“Corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–90

Title

Early Preplant Application Timing Effects on Acetamide Efficacy in No-Till Corn (Zea mays)1

JEFFREY A. BUNTING; F. WILLIAM SIMMONS; LOYD M. WAX Weed Technology 2003. doi:10.1614/0890-037x(2003)017[0291:epateo]2.0.co;2

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-846facb4b4cc4b38edda151fd985eeaefe6df1a1dabe41e92f783898695d0dde · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

acetochlor · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 13 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.