Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Minimum tillage increased weed growth in the second year of maize monocropping.

A claim from Weed growth and crop yield responses to tillage and mulching under different crop rotation sequences in semi‐arid conditions · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Minimum tillage increased weed growth in the second year of maize monocropping.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Minimum tillagee0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed growthe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
2nd year of maize monocroppinge0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Minimum tillage increased weed growth in 2nd year of maize monocropping.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1095

Title

Weed growth and crop yield responses to tillage and mulching under different crop rotation sequences in semi‐arid conditions

N. Mashingaidze; S. Twomlow; I.C. Madakadze; et al. Soil Use and Management 2017. doi:10.1111/sum.12338

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-1fa2be3773eedc3ad2500ed87a0841c3c3399c0e1bf49ae9f68a891ae51c6e73 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

tillage · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

111 papers: 65 positive, 46 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this claim · 65 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
    The Nebraska till-plant system moved weed seed away from the corn row.

    Effect of Seedbed Preparation for Corn on Distribution of Weed Seed · 1971 · compared with conventional disking and plowing system of seedbed preparation

    Opposite direction

  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

102 papers more in this group

See all 111 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.