Claim · model-written summary
Proline content was significantly lower in primed than unprimed stressed plants.
Triticum aestivumNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Pro content was significantly lower in SPro compared to S”
t0“Wheat”
Title
Jan Pecka; Kamil Kraus; Martin Zelený; et al. Agronomy 2025. doi:10.3390/agronomy15061370
Other claims from this paper (17)
- Intervention effect Drought reduced photosynthesis, transpiration and stomatal conductance in both stress groups.
- Intervention effect Drought reduced leaf water potential in both stress groups.
- Intervention effect Proline and MDA content increased under stress.
- Intervention effect Primed stressed plants had higher transpiration and stomatal conductance.
- Intervention effect MDA differed nonsignificantly between primed and unprimed stressed plants.
- Intervention effect The second drought period caused more pronounced gas exchange limitations in both groups.
- Observation Unprimed stressed plants had lower water potential than primed stressed plants.
- Observation Unprimed stressed plants accumulated more proline than primed stressed plants.
- Intervention effect Exogenous proline reduced endogenous proline synthesis.
- Intervention effect Exogenous proline improved photosystem II protection.
- Intervention effect Rehydration restored all monitored physiological parameters.
- Intervention effect Proline treated plants recovered gas exchange more efficiently.
- Intervention effect Long interval priming improved preparedness for later drought.
- Mechanism Stress memory supported more efficient osmoregulation.
- Mechanism Stress memory reduced lipid peroxidation.
- Mechanism Stress memory improved photosystem II integrity protection.
- Mechanism Stress memory supported more effective gas exchange restart after rehydration.