Paper · 2025 · Agronomy

Exogenous Proline Modulates Physiological Responses and Induces Stress Memory in Wheat Under Repeated and Delayed Drought Stress

Jan Pecka; Kamil Kraus; Martin Zelený; et al.

18
claims
36
verbatim quotes
4
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Drought stress negatively affects plant metabolism and growth, triggering complex defence mechanisms to limit damage. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a single foliar application of 1 mM L-proline (Pro) in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L., cv. Bohemie) in two separate experiments differing in the time interval between application and drought—7 days (experiment 1) and 35 days (experiment 2). Net photosynthetic rate (A), transpiration rate (E), stomatal conductance (gs), leaf water potential (Ψw), intrinsic water use efficiency (WUEi), endogenous proline content (Pro), malondialdehyde content (MDA), and maximum quantum yield of photosystem II (Fv/Fm) were measured. In experiment 1, drought markedly reduced net photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate, stomatal conductance, and leaf water potential in both drought-stressed treatments, namely, without priming plants (S) and with Pro priming plants (SPro). Pro and MDA content increased under stress. Higher E and gs in the SPro treatment indicated more effective stomatal regulation and a distinct water use strategy. Pro content was significantly lower in SPro compared to S, whereas differences in MDA levels between these treatments were not statistically significant. The second drought period (D2) led to more pronounced limitations in gas exchange in both S and SPro. Enhanced osmoregulation was reflected by lower Ψw (S < SPro) and higher Pro accumulation in S (S > SPro). The effect of exogenous Pro persisted in the form of reduced endogenous Pro synthesis and improved photosystem II protection. Rehydration of stressed plants restored all monitored physiological parameters, and Pro-treated plants exhibited a more efficient recovery of gas exchange. Experiment 2 demonstrated a long-lasting priming effect that improved the preparedness of plants for future drought events. In the SPro treatment, this stress memory supported more efficient osmoregulation, reduced lipid peroxidation, improved protection of photosystem II integrity, and a more effective restart of gas exchange following rehydration. Our findings highlight the potential of exogenous proline as a practical tool for enhancing crop resilience to climate-induced drought stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced photosynthesis, transpiration and stomatal conductance in both stress groups.

Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
net photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate, stomatal conductancee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought markedly reduced net photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate, stomatal conductance, and leaf water potential in both drought-stressed treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–852 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced leaf water potential in both stress groups.

Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
leaf water potentiale0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought markedly reduced net photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate, stomatal conductance, and leaf water potential in both drought-stressed treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–852 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline and MDA content increased under stress.

Treatment
stresse0
Outcome
Pro and MDA contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pro and MDA content increased under stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–967 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Primed stressed plants had higher transpiration and stomatal conductance.

Treatment
SPro treatmente0
Outcome
E and gse0
Direction
Highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher E and gs in the SPro treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1006 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline content was significantly lower in primed than unprimed stressed plants.

Treatment
SProe0
Outcome
Pro contente0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
Se0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pro content was significantly lower in SPro compared to S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1144 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

MDA differed nonsignificantly between primed and unprimed stressed plants.

Treatment
these treatmentse0
Outcome
MDA levelse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“differences in MDA levels between these treatments were not statistically significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1239 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The second drought period caused more pronounced gas exchange limitations in both groups.

Treatment
second drought period (D2)e0
Outcome
limitations in gas exchangee0
Direction
more pronouncede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The second drought period (D2) led to more pronounced limitations in gas exchange in both S and SPro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1341 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Unprimed stressed plants had lower water potential than primed stressed plants.

Treatment
Se0
Outcome
Ψwe0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
SProe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lower Ψw (S < SPro)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1384–1403 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Unprimed stressed plants accumulated more proline than primed stressed plants.

Treatment
Se0
Outcome
Pro accumulatione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
SProe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher Pro accumulation in S (S > SPro)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1408–1447 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exogenous proline reduced endogenous proline synthesis.

Treatment
exogenous Proe0
Outcome
endogenous Pro synthesise0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effect of exogenous Pro persisted in the form of reduced endogenous Pro synthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1453–1534 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exogenous proline improved photosystem II protection.

Treatment
exogenous Proe0
Outcome
photosystem II protectione0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“exogenous Pro persisted in the form of reduced endogenous Pro synthesis and improved photosystem II protection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1463–1573 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rehydration restored all monitored physiological parameters.

Treatment
Rehydratione0
Outcome
all monitored physiological parameterse0
Direction
restorede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rehydration of stressed plants restored all monitored physiological parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1575–1653 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline treated plants recovered gas exchange more efficiently.

Treatment
Pro-treatede0
Outcome
recovery of gas exchangee0
Direction
more efficiente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pro-treated plants exhibited a more efficient recovery of gas exchange”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1659–1729 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Long interval priming improved preparedness for later drought.

Treatment
priminge0
Outcome
preparedness of plants for future drought eventse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Experiment 2 demonstrated a long-lasting priming effect that improved the preparedness of plants for future drought events”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1731–1853 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stress memory supported more efficient osmoregulation.

Outcome
osmoregulatione0
Direction
more efficiente0
Qualifier
stress memorye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this stress memory supported more efficient osmoregulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1878–1936 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stress memory reduced lipid peroxidation.

Outcome
lipid peroxidatione0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
stress memorye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this stress memory supported more efficient osmoregulation, reduced lipid peroxidation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1878–1964 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stress memory improved photosystem II integrity protection.

Outcome
protection of photosystem II integritye0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
stress memorye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this stress memory supported more efficient osmoregulation, reduced lipid peroxidation, improved protection of photosystem II integrity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1878–2013 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stress memory supported more effective gas exchange restart after rehydration.

Outcome
restart of gas exchangee0
Direction
more effectivee0
Qualifier
stress memorye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this stress memory supported more efficient osmoregulation, reduced lipid peroxidation, improved protection of photosystem II integrity, and a more effective restart of gas exchange following rehydration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1878–2081 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: gas exchange · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

76 papers: 5 positive, 71 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

72 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

drought · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

206 papers: 60 positive, 146 negative or no effect

145 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

202 papers more in this group

See all 206 papers →

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

246 papers: 41 positive, 205 negative or no effect

204 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

242 papers more in this group

See all 246 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.