Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Under dehydration, stomatal and cuticular transpiration was lower in spike, peduncle and leaf sheath than in leaf blades.

A claim from Photosynthesis in different parts of a wheat plant · 2009

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under dehydration, stomatal and cuticular transpiration was lower in spike, peduncle and leaf sheath than in leaf blades.

Organ / stage
spike, peduncle and leaf sheathe4
Treatment
dehydratione4
Outcome
stomatal and cuticular transpiratione4
Direction
lowere4
Comparator
leaf bladese4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The response curves of photosynthesis in excised leaves to dehydration suggested that retention abilities of tissue water and photosynthesis were higher and the stomatal and cuticular transpiration in spike, peduncle and leaf sheath was lower than in leaf blades”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1285
t0

“Photosynthesis in different parts of a wheat plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–50

Title

Photosynthesis in different parts of a wheat plant

Feifei Qin; Du FangLing; Rongyan Xu; et al. Lanzhou University Institutional Repository 2009

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-482bdfc6c3ba5c1911c5ea71bdfb89e5a5211e88f712c6fd1161566d85db79f1 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

drought · physiology: gas exchange · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

76 papers: 5 positive, 71 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 71 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

67 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.