Claim · model-written summary
Different latex harvesting technologies improved rubber productivity of PB 260 to 5469 kg per hectare per year compared with down tapping.
- Taxon
- Hevea brasiliensis
Hevea brasiliensist0 - Material
- PB 260e1
- Treatment
- different latex harvesting technologiese1
- Outcome
- rubber productivitye1
- Direction
- improvee1
- Value
- 5469 kg.ha-1.yr-1e1
- Comparator
- down tappinge4
- Setting
- Southwestern Cote d'Ivoiret0
Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effect of Late Upward Tapping on the Productivity of the Metabolically Active Hevea brasiliensis Clone PB 260 in Southwestern Cote d'Ivoire”
e1“The results show that the different latex harvesting technologies improve the rubber productivity of PB 260 (5469 kg.ha-1.yr-1) with a low dry-nut rate (1.2%) and satisfactory radial vegetative growth (3.9cm.yr-1)”
e4“Late reverse tapping is therefore a good latex harvesting technology for improving rubber productivity after down tapping”
Title
Kouakou N’guessan Kan Pulchérie; Moro Affia Perpetue; Diarrassouba Moussa; et al. Annual Research & Review in Biology 2021. doi:10.9734/arrb/2021/v36i1030440
Other claims from this paper (6)
- Observation Latex harvesting technologies gave a low dry-nut rate of 1.2% in PB 260.
- Observation Latex harvesting technologies gave satisfactory radial vegetative growth of 3.9 cm per year in PB 260.
- Observation The physiological profile of the trees was balanced.
- Observation The tapping treatments significantly influenced the physiological and growth parameters, except sucrose.
- Intervention effect Trees bled in S/4U d3 gave better results, with high yield and an acceptable dry notch rate.
- Recommendation Late reverse tapping is a good latex harvesting technology for improving rubber productivity after down tapping (authors recommendation).