Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Silage of corn intercropped with Paiaguas palisadegrass in the row and inter-row at the hard dough stage had greater productivity per area than corn monocropped.

A claim from Production and quality of the silage of corn intercropped with Paiaguas palisadegrass in different forage systems and maturity stages · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silage of corn intercropped with Paiaguas palisadegrass in the row and inter-row at the hard dough stage had greater productivity per area than corn monocropped.

Organ / stage
hard dough stagee2
Treatment
intercropped with Paiaguas palisadegrass in the row and inter-rowe2
Outcome
productivity per areae2
Direction
greatere2
Comparator
corn monocroppede1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“corn monocropped; Paiaguas palisadegrass monocropped”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–448
e2

“The results showed that the silage of corn intercropped with Paiaguas palisadegrass in the row and inter-row at the hard dough stage presented greater productivity per area and better fermentative and nutritional characteristics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–882

Title

Production and quality of the silage of corn intercropped with Paiaguas palisadegrass in different forage systems and maturity stages

Wender Ferreira de Souza; Kátia Aparecida de Pinho Costa; Analu Guarnieri; et al. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 2019. doi:10.1590/rbz4820180222

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-20f80e4e26e450d7458cc46cb003524d0406110235b136e3f1825d537a798912 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

Urochloa brizantha · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
See all 8 papers →

intercropping · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

834 papers: 613 positive, 221 negative or no effect

612 papers in the same direction as this claim · 181 in the opposite direction · 40 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

825 papers more in this group

See all 834 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.